“The qualifications of apostleship are not the same as those of bishopric.”
Indeed, the qualifications for apostleship are superior.
“Paul wasnt a husband, yet his instructions to husbands in Ephesians are still from God. He wasnt a wife either, yet he gave instructions to wives. He neednt be a bishop for his instructions regarding them to be understood and obeyed.”
He could instruct the bishops because his authority was superior to them. Ergo, if the superior position permits unmarried men, then so should the inferior one.
“As I posted earlier, the husband of one wife could have one of two possible meanings. But theres one meaning it cant have, and thats the husband of NO wife. Otherwise Paul is speaking nonsense.”
The husband of but one wife - if you are married, you can only have one. It does not say that marriage is required. Don’t you think that Paul would have made it explicitly clear, if this were, in fact the case, by saying “unmarried men are forbidden to enter the episcopy?”
1 Corinthians 7:32-3 is very clear. Paul argues for the superiority of celibacy over the married life.
“One who is unmarried is concerned about the things of the Lord, how he may please the Lord; but one who is married is concerned about the things of the world, how he may please his wife, and his interests are divided.”
Now, how can one read this and reach the conclusion that marriage is required for the episcopy?