“I think your statement: “If Genesis is meant as a fairy tale, then that isn’t showing man love...” is you clearly stating that is Pope’s position.”
Yes, surely, I think that I’ve said as much several times already, and I’ll say it again. His statements imply that Genesis is a fairy tale and not a truthful account of fact that can be read at face value.
“For your edification, this text may be more meaningful to you:”
I’m not sure what the point is of reposting the text of the article that we are already discussing. Seems kind of redundant to me.
“Regarding John6:56, your interpretation is incorrect, as verse 61 contiues:”
I don’t seem anything in that passage that says my interpretation is incorrect. Of course if you believe in literal transubstantiation and all that, you will believe my interpretation is incorrect, whether or not the Bible backs your view. However, that is not the topic of this thread and I think that getting into a dispute of that would not be proper.
“You may wish to reconsider you methods and practices around Biblical interpretation, as well as your interpretation of secular articles discussing religious topics.”
No, I think I will stick to trusting God over men and refusing to take the easy path by going along with the wisdom of the world.
It is clear that your intention was to post a reply not meant for discussion, but rather argument.
You make a statement that is inconsistent with what was reported, attempting to pass it off as truth.
You continue to demonstrate that you either haven’t read the article or read it thoroughly.
Your interpretation and comments regarding John 6:56 also demonstrate, like those listening to Jesus, you find it hard to hear and believe. And clearly, the Bible does back my view, as it comes straight from the mouth of Our Lord.
I will pray that your zeal for the Truth leads you to the fullest possible relationship with Our Lord.
May God’s peace fill your heart and days!