I'm afraid my words have confused you. I really meant that the group whose beliefs I wish to share is that of the Apostles who were chosen by Christ to be his special disciples; commissioned by Him as Apostles; and regenerated at the first post-Resurrection/Ascension gathering on the day of Pentecost. Post-Pentecostal Apostles means those minus Judas and later supplemented by Paul.
All they said and did is recorded in the New Testament. It's all laid out, and needs no improvement, changing, embroidering, tailoring. This group existed (in the Bible) long before the invention of a mystical, invisible overarching catholicism ( not in the Bible) by ante-Nicene, error-prone patristics.
I am regularly a congregant of a local, independent, autonomous New Testament immersionist assembly of believer-disciples that meets as a local body of The Christ who is its sufficient Head, observing the ordinances of Christ, guided by the Word of The God alone, maintaining their purity through strong preaching and church discipline, and carrying The Gospel of The Faith to worldlings still stricken with sin and death. (not "Pentecostal" or "charismatic" as commonly misused today)
Capisce?
Right, something like that seems to be fairly normal for those that express the belief that the Catholic Church is the whore of babylon on FR. I don’t think I recall ever seeing such an opinion expresses on FR by a member of a nonCatholic Christian group that has some sort of creed or deposit of faith that coincides with their own belief that can be referred to by an outsider. I think it must be considered too wacky. You don’t see that opinion too often on FR, and then usually only from self proclaimed ‘non-denominational’ Christians, or those that decline to state the Christian group that they most associate with. For some reason.
Even on an anonymous conservative forum.
Freegards