Were there figures for heterosexual couples who lived together but who were not married? That would be the valid comparison, I would think.
So you’re saying that sexual perverts if “married” would be different from non-”married” sexual perverts?
If that’s what you mean, you’re wrong. The big deal is the difference between normal man/woman couples and two sexual perverts. That’s the difference, not “married” or not.
They would say that an unmarried heterosexual couple living together is unmarried by choice, and a gay couple -- due to the unbearable oppression of inequality under the law giving them indigestion, anguish and early death. You can't beat that with heterosexual logic.