Ann makes at least 7 reasoned points. (For the idiots reading this, reasoned does not necessarily mean correct). Yet most of the bozos responding only attacks Ann as a nut case. Not one of them writes where she is wrong. Yup, sounds like good libtards methods to me.
I pray and am sure Ann does also that she is found to be wrong. But methinks she may be dead on correct.
I skimmed it, and saw blasphemous trash, as I had before.
My comment is, she, and others on the left and far right and deranged, angry, what have you, they do not have to be Catholic and they do not have to like the Church.
I can read criticism of the government, the pundits and the voters. It is a democratic republic.
The Church is not democratic. It never was and it never will be.
Criticism from a woman who is angry is nothing I want to read.
I made my comment starting out with: I didn't read it.
I also acknowledge that many otherwise informed people have no regard for the history of the Church and its leaders all of whom have education and humanitarian credentials pages long. She criticizes the Mass. It is a low priority and it proves to me she needs to get a life and quit dumping her finances onto misguided charity cases and take a lesson from the Pope who wouldn't dump all his resources onto an unappreciative and undeserving case who would ruin him or the Church, as Ann did and as the US is doing in concurrence with the USCCB in catering to illegals who care nothing for this country.>