Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: daniel1212; CottShop
Actually, Cot did, I sent them to Cot privately (with a few other personal events I have knowledge of), I think he even said in this open thread they were not supernatural.
Apparently, regeneration of bone, changing muscles, healing people of pneumonia and caner are not supernatural enough.

Thanks for your posts Dan.

Halleluiah!!!

By His stripes we are healed

Sin has lost it’s power

Death has lost it’s sting

From the grave You have risen victoriously!

165 posted on 03/31/2013 3:16:02 PM PDT by svcw (Why is one cell on another planet considered life, and in the womb it is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]


To: svcw

Amen!


166 posted on 03/31/2013 5:07:11 PM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies ]

To: svcw

[[Apparently, regeneration of bone, changing muscles, healing people of pneumonia and caner are not supernatural enough]]

Wow- I am sayign they are not sueprnatural at all- If God heals using natural means- then hte healing is via natural means- not supernatural means- it violated no natural laws- The fact of the matter is that they apostles and Christ and prophets did SUPERNATURAL miracles all the time- There is nothign SUPERNATURAL about bone regeneration- nothign SUPERNATURAL abotu pneumonia clearing up- pneumonias clear up all the time- and there’s nothign SUPERNATURAL abotu cancer goign into remission- many many cancer patients have had their cancers go into remission without healerrs prayign over them- Crossed eyes resolve spontanuiously all the time-

[[are not supernatural enough.]]

Can you HONESTLY compare thsoe thigns which CAN occure naturally with soemthing like restorign a missing limb with nothign but a command? The claim was that God has not stopped doing supernaturnatural miracles and it weas implied that healers are still conduits of these supernatural miracles- I’ve asked repetedly for exampels of TRUE SUPERNATURAL MIRACLES which VIOLATE NATURAL LAW- All I really got was soemthign akin to “Well, them iracles done today are of a lesser strength” and got only exampels of all things that ‘could be’ natural- or ‘could be’ God workign htrough natural means to facilitate a healing- The TRUE SUPERNATURAL MIRACLES which VIOLATE NATURAL LAW Left no doubt in anyone’s minds as to whether they were supernatural or not- They had to be TRUE SUPERNATURAL MIRACLES which VIOLATE NATURAL LAW because they did precisely that- they violated nature- None of the thigns I’ve seen presented as evidence are ‘violations of nature’- and everyone of them ‘coudl happen naturally, and infact HAVE happened naturally in many cases throughout hte world- Whichj leaves one to wonder whether it was God or whether God just allowed it to happen naturally- When Christ and apostles and prohpets did the TRUE SUPERNATURAL MIRACLES which VIOLATE NATURAL LAW- there was NO question in anyone’s minds- the proof was right before their eyes that soemthign SUPERNATURAL which VIOLATED NATURAL LAW had just taken place

You told me in the pm tta all I have to do is beleive that my missing part will be regenerated and it wil happen- I ask you why should I beleive that when NOONE has ever had missing parts regenerated before? (After the age of TRUE SUPERNATURAL MIRACLES which VIOLATE NATURAL LAW ended) If God is still owkring TRUE SUPERNATURAL MIRACLES which VIOLATE NATURAL LAW through faith healers today- why were we NOT seeign evidnece of regeneration of missing body parts? Surely peopel in my same health condition somewhere in the world woudl have had enough faith to have the part regeenrated? No? Yet there has been not one single case- If healers are still doing TRUE SUPERNATURAL MIRACLES which VIOLATE NATURAL LAW but htese TRUE SUPERNATURAL MIRACLES which VIOLATE NATURAL LAW are of a ‘lesser strength’ then wherre is the evidence that the healings violate natural law?


168 posted on 03/31/2013 10:35:07 PM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson