Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pope Francis: Never speak poorly of others
Vatican News Agency ^ | March 28, 2013

Posted on 03/29/2013 11:34:24 AM PDT by NYer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: Carl LaFong

Actually he is wise and loving and powerfully EFFECTIVE.

;-)


21 posted on 03/29/2013 12:43:12 PM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo....Sum Pro Vita - Modified Descartes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
Yeah, because Jesus never spoke poorly about any of his enemies.... < eyeroll>

What part of "whitewashed sepulchers" did the Pope not read?

22 posted on 03/29/2013 1:06:11 PM PDT by Alex Murphy ("If you are not firm in faith, you will not be firm at all" - Isaiah 7:9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
He's talking about gossip, Alex. He's not talking about just judgment.

Is that so hard to understand?

Didn't we all get "context reading" in 5th grade?

23 posted on 03/29/2013 1:10:41 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ( Habemus Papam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: NYer

The Pope is wrong. While he might find it bad form to speak poorly of others the Lord Almighty (who outranks Francis) commands that we are not to bear false witness.

Therefore you speak the TRUTH be it good or bad.


24 posted on 03/29/2013 1:11:52 PM PDT by MeganC (The left have so twisted public perceptions that the truth now appears pornographic.- SpaceBar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

Did you read it?

He’s speaking of GOSSIP. Gossip is one of the most destructive things imaginable.

How politically correct is that? Or do the Gospels and Acts and Letters let THAT slide?


25 posted on 03/29/2013 1:27:30 PM PDT by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Sorry, no can do.


             Actually, there's no 'sorry' about it.

26 posted on 03/29/2013 1:28:57 PM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

.. (but i don't do gossip, never have)
27 posted on 03/29/2013 1:31:54 PM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: csmusaret
Q:"How do I describe Democrats?"

A: Democrats.

Isn't that one word descriptive enough?

28 posted on 03/29/2013 2:11:00 PM PDT by 1_Rain_Drop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SMCC1
He’s talking about gossip. If people would actually read the article...

Yes - Gossip is wrong, that is what I got out of it too
29 posted on 03/29/2013 2:23:27 PM PDT by BigEdLB (Now there ARE 1,000,000 regrets - but it may be too late.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I don’t speak poorly.

When I describe someone as an idiot, I’m usually very precise!


30 posted on 03/29/2013 2:25:55 PM PDT by djf (I don't want to be safe. I want to be FREE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: djf

It takes one to know one ;)


31 posted on 03/29/2013 2:31:50 PM PDT by 1_Rain_Drop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Let me put this into perspective for you all. If you complain to a neighbor about another neighbor allowing his/her children to play in the busy street and risk getting run over, you are NOT gossiping. You are merely warning people to watch for those unfortunate children, but if you say Mrs. So and So down the street is having an affair, you ARE gossiping.


32 posted on 03/29/2013 2:57:32 PM PDT by kitkat (STORM THE HEAVENS WITH PRAYERS FOR OUR COUNTRY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1_Rain_Drop

How do you know?


33 posted on 03/29/2013 3:00:06 PM PDT by Gene Eric (The Palin Doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: MeganC
"The Pope is wrong. While he might find it bad form to speak poorly of others the Lord Almighty (who outranks Francis) commands that we are not to bear false witness."

Pope is not wrong. You may be misinterpreting to whom he's speaking and taking his message out of context. For example, he could be speaking about the media who has lied, twisted stories to defame someone just so they could keep their jobs ($$) and be the focus of attention. The media would be Judas. Those who repeat the media's lies, would be little judasses because they are magnifying lies and sacrificing someone good so they could make themselves look good and knowledgeable. They would be gossiping. THEY would be the ones bearing false witness!!

Now, if you say the media is lying and have facts to backup your position, you are then defending the truth and the person who is being defamed. You are not bearing false witness but are setting the truth free! Just make sure that while defending a good person, you do not put down the bearer of lies. Might as well not mention the liars/gossipers because that would still keep them on a pedestal.

That's what I get from Pope Francis' message.

34 posted on 03/29/2013 3:09:40 PM PDT by 1_Rain_Drop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: 1_Rain_Drop

If he is speaking against spreading falsehoods then he is right. If he is speaking against doing verbal harm to someone, even though that may be true, then he is wrong.

The truth deserves to be spoken boldly and without cessation.


35 posted on 03/29/2013 4:16:03 PM PDT by MeganC (The left have so twisted public perceptions that the truth now appears pornographic.- SpaceBar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SMCC1
He’s talking about gossip. If people would actually read the article...

Too many on FR have knee-jerk POLITICAL reactions to the Pope's words, forgetting that he's talking on a MORAL plane, not a political one.

36 posted on 03/31/2013 11:34:40 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MeganC
Therefore you speak the TRUTH be it good or bad.

The Church teaches against the sin of CALUMNY, which is speaking what might be the truth about someone, but doing so only to try to tear down that person, PERSONALLY, in the eyes of someone else, in order to hurt them. This isn't the same as pointing out what we might consider an error in someone's political views, in order to advance our own.

37 posted on 03/31/2013 11:37:46 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson