Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Abp. Vigneron: Gay Marriage Supporters Shoud Refrain From Communion
Creative Minority Report ^ | 4/8/13 | Patrick Archbold

Posted on 04/08/2013 6:43:42 PM PDT by markomalley

Archbishop Vigneron of Detroit has done a shocking thing. He has stated the obvious. Bishops should be doing a lot more obvious stating.

A Detroit professor and legal adviser to the Vatican says Catholics who promote gay marriage should not try to receive holy Communion, a key part of Catholic identity.

And the archbishop of Detroit, Allen Vigneron, said Sunday that Catholics who receive Communion while advocating gay marriage would "logically bring shame for a double-dealing that is not unlike perjury."

And then of course they dig up this guy, whose only job seems to give comments like this to media.

Most American bishops do not favor denying either politicians or voters Communion because of their positions on controversial issues," said Thomas Reese, a Catholic priest and senior fellow at the Woodstock Theological Center at Georgetown University. Reese said that Peters' views are "in a minority among American canon lawyers."

But, Reese added, "about 30 or so bishops have said that pro-choice or pro-gay-marriage Catholics should not present themselves for Communion."
They are not controversial from a Catholic point of view, only from a dissenters point of view.

Good on ya Archbishop Vigneron. Now that they have been warned, it is time to follow through.


TOPICS: Catholic
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; ssm
Hoo-rah! About time!
1 posted on 04/08/2013 6:43:42 PM PDT by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Canonist Ed Peters does the take-down on Rev. Reese:

There are a couple of technical slips in Niraj Warikoo’s article in the Detroit Free Press on the reception of holy Communion by gay activists (e.g., I hold a professorial chair at Sacred Heart Seminary, I am not a “chairman”, and one of my longer quotes is condensed to the point of confusing), but generally his presentation of my views (and I think of Abp. Vigneron’s) is well done.

Only the comments of Fr. Thomas Reese, sj, require, as per usual, contextualization, if not challenge. Per Reese: “Most American bishops do not favor denying either politicians or voters Communion because of their positions on controversial issues” and Peters’ views are “in a minority among American canon lawyers.

Re Reese’s first comment—and setting aside his transparent attempt to steer the Canon 915 discussion into the voting booth, wherein no one thinks it applies—Reese is commenting on how bishops act whereas I am commenting on how canon law expects bishops and others to act. Reese’s claim about bishops’ (in)action, even if true, would not make my views (actually, the 1983 Code’s views, resting on settled Church teaching) wrong, it would simply mark them as ignored. To be sure, the implications for me if my views are wrong, and for others if my views are right, are pretty obvious, but my hunch is, Reese knows that.

Re his second comment, Reese cites no canon lawyers who regard my position as “minority” (as if being in agreement with John Paul II, Cdl. Burke, then-Cdl. Ratzinger, and the PCLT could leave one worrying about one’s ‘minority status’) though a few canonists have expressed alternative interpretations of the law. That’s fine, of course, it’s what lawyers do, but that only pushes the real question—namely, whose interpretation of the law is the more sound—back a bit. Eventually that fundamental question pops back up and needs to be addressed.

Finally, it seems to me that most of those (rather few) canonists who do express alternative interpretations of Canon 915 do not, when one gets right down to it, disagree with my read of the law, rather, they hesitate over whether the facts of individual cases meet the criteria set out in Canon 915. Fact questions are very important, I grant, but they lend themselves to resolution based on objective information. I’ve always said that and so have the US bishops. What concerns me, and what I spend most of my time defending in this matter, is the basic point that Church law requires, upon the demonstration of certain kinds of facts, that canonico-sacramental consequences follow.

But again, I think Reese knows that; he just doesn’t like it.


2 posted on 04/08/2013 6:46:12 PM PDT by markomalley (Nothing emboldens the wicked so greatly as the lack of courage on the part of the good -- Leo XIII)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

“....Catholics who promote gay marriage should not try to receive holy Communion....”

.
Neither should those who voted for the very politicians who promote these evils e.g. Obama, Biden, Pelosi, Kerry et al.

All Americans of good will, put the cards down and place your bets.


3 posted on 04/08/2013 7:01:17 PM PDT by 353FMG ( I do not indicate whether I am serious or sarcastic -- I respect FReepers too much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

YES! More need to follow this man’s lead. Don’t leave it up to them though, archbishop. DENY them communion.


4 posted on 04/08/2013 7:06:14 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

” Don’t leave it up to them though, archbishop. DENY them communion.”

Although I agree that for high profile people it should be denied, T think for the most part it is taken care of by the fact that communion received when you are not in a state of grace is not communion at all.


5 posted on 04/08/2013 7:25:19 PM PDT by babygene ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

It is long past time to have more of this. It is one thing to be attending a church seeking redemption it is another altogether to be actively promoting ones sinful nature proudly flaunting church tenants. Personally I believe all churches should be more demanding of their flocks especially their high profile political flock. Who do they serve God or the world? I believe one of the reasons church attendance and relevancy has fallen is because it in many cases has become meaningless not just on gays and abortion but on a whole slew of issues. Where are the courageous prophets of God like Nathan who chastised the likes of King David? People don’t tend to follow those who act like they are apologizing for what they believe.


6 posted on 04/08/2013 10:14:24 PM PDT by Maelstorm (This country wasn't founded with the battle cry "Give me liberty or give me a govt check!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

I’m guessing Father Reese is another mealy-mouthed Jesuit Lib.


7 posted on 04/08/2013 10:17:28 PM PDT by princeofdarkness (The GOP is the present version of 1940 France and it will only get worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
...said Thomas Reese, a Catholic dissident priest and senior fellow...
8 posted on 04/08/2013 10:28:11 PM PDT by BlessedBeGod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

May God bless and keep this archbishop. And may more come forward and speak the truth.


9 posted on 04/08/2013 10:37:01 PM PDT by Bigg Red (Restore us, O God of hosts; let your face shine, that we may be saved! -Ps80)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red

When these Pro-Abortion and Pro-Gay “Catholics” go up for Holy Communion WITHOUT going to Confession first, they are committing a great SCANDAL and they have a MILLSTONE around their neck...woe to them. God will NOT be MOCKED.


10 posted on 04/09/2013 3:17:18 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion.....the HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: markomalley; fellowpatriot; MarineMom613; Ron C.; wolfman23601; ColdOne; navymom1; Pat4ever; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.

11 posted on 04/09/2013 3:37:32 AM PDT by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Good.

Maybe one day we shall have a functioning episcopacy in America.


12 posted on 04/09/2013 5:50:25 AM PDT by annalex (fear them not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

13 posted on 04/09/2013 10:14:23 AM PDT by topher (Traditional values -- especially family values -- which have been proven over time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

Gay ‘marriage’ is a fraud.


14 posted on 04/09/2013 10:16:16 AM PDT by ex-snook (God is Love)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson