Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: DouglasKC

“Son of man” is regarded as a mistranlation...this is how chabad.org translates it...”Ancient of Days” just refers to God and his eternal nature.

Daniel 7:13. I saw in the visions of the night, and behold with the clouds of the heaven, one like a man was coming, and he came up to the Ancient of Days and was brought before Him.

http://www.chabad.org/library/bible_cdo/aid/16490

I enjoyed the article on the early days of the Christian Church as well...”the making of the sausage” is very interesting..


47 posted on 04/15/2013 6:35:28 PM PDT by martiangohome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: martiangohome
“Son of man” is regarded as a mistranlation...this is how chabad.org translates it...”Ancient of Days” just refers to God and his eternal nature. Daniel 7:13. I saw in the visions of the night, and behold with the clouds of the heaven, one like a man was coming, and he came up to the Ancient of Days and was brought before Him.

Okay, I get the mistranslation part, but do they think that the "man" is the future messiah going to be given in a kingdom in verse 14?

49 posted on 04/15/2013 6:39:56 PM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson