Posted on 05/02/2013 7:26:48 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Dr. Phil is about as relevant as dog doo, he would be nothing without Oprah!
From the new powers that be....”Once you go gay then you must stay!”
Who cares about him?
He’s not licensed anymore, and even admits he’s not really practicing psychology.
Oprah attracts all kinds of people like that because it fits her views.
The scientific community claims that male homosexuals experience an absent/passive father and domineering mother. However, they can't explain away the straight men who happen to have that same combination. They can't explain away female homosexuals either.
It's a choice; that is the explanation. God made Adam and Eve, nor Adam and Steve.
[[Dr. Phil flat-out shut the mother’s opinion down, along with her Christian values, in favor for the simple explanation that “this is who her daughter is” and she should just accept it.]]
But apparently “This is how hte omther is, and hte daughter should ‘just accept it’ “ isn’t allowed by the ‘tolorant’- they can’t accept that manty peopel DO NOT APPROVE of homosexuality- nor can they bear the thought that such moral views exist- they DENY us hte right to oppose homosexuality claimign we are ‘beign narrow minded’ compeltey ignorign hte FACT that htey are beign narrow minded abotu ouir opposition
He practices SICKology, not psychology.
Oprah has always been a waste. Always will be.
Dr. Phil is a bigot.
The Communist Takeover Of
America - 45 Declared Goals
#41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.
http://rense.com/general32/americ.htm
(Hurry up, commies!)
Dr. Phil is a bigot.
That is short for his real name BIG IDIOT
Dr Phil, who?
I'm picking up Dr. Phil right now.
As with the APA, Dr. Phil is a classic pseudoscientist. He’s no more reliable for accuracy than a Romanian astrologer.
You disrespecting Romanian astrologers?
The PC storm troopers gonna be coming to knock on your door!
I bet he doesn’t complain about ex straights.
It keeps on being repeated that being gay is biological, and these new "theories" keep on being brought out. Problem is, these are just theories, NOTHING has been substantiated.
(If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.-Joseph Goebbels)
So, we have a dilema. There are numerous, tens of thousands of people, like Anne Heche, who turn their back, for one reason or another, on the gay lifestyle. How are these people able to deny something that is claimed to be biological?
Next...
IF...IF it is biological, then why isn't it viewed the same as many other biological conditions? Cleft palates, Downs syndrome, Achondroplasia, Cerebal Palsy, Marfan syndrome, Spina Bifida, chromosomal dissorders and a whole list of others.
In all of these conditions, the medical field is looking for CURES or treatments for these conditions. Meanwhile, nobody is looking for a CURE for gayness, or a treatment for it.
Its treated completely different from othe "born conditions". Maybe the reason its treated differently is because they WANT it to be treated differently.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.