Unreal!
Please Contribute Tonight!
Posted on 05/02/2013 7:26:48 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
On April 1, 2013 Dr. Phil aired a show titled: "Shocking Mom Revelations." As a part of this episode, he interviewed a mother whose daughter identified as a lesbian. During the episode, the mother shared about her disapproval of her daughter's "lifestyle choice" and expressed a desire for her daughter to see a counselor to get help in exploring her same-sex attraction.
In shockingly un-therapeutic fashion, Dr. Phil flat-out shut the mother's opinion down, along with her Christian values, in favor for the simple explanation that "this is who her daughter is" and she should just accept it. Below is an excerpt from the letter we sent:
Dear Dr. Phil,
While we do not condone this mother's belief that homosexuality is simply a "choice" per se, science has recognized, through 100 years of peer-reviewed research, that homosexuality is in fact fluid for some individuals. For example, a recent study published in the prestigious Archives of Sexual Behavior journal titled: "Stability and Change in Same-Sex Attraction, Experience, and Identity by Sex and Age in a New Zealand Birth Cohort" (Dickson, van Roode, Cameron, and Paul, 2013) showed the experiences of same-sex attraction significantly decreased among women and men with increasing age. Similarly, prior research has shown that exclusive opposite-sex attraction is approximately 17 times more stable than exclusive same-sex attraction for men and 30 times more stable than exclusive same-sex attraction for women (Whitehead & Whitehead, 2011).
There is an abundance of scientific peer-reviewed research that shows homosexuality is not an enduring and immutable characteristic, thus proving the very statement that Dr. Phil said at the end of the episode: "I don't believe there is any such thing as an 'ex-gay'" as categorically false, unscientific, and defamatory to the thousands of former homosexuals, persons with unwanted same-sex attractions, and their families.
Further, Dr. Phil's comment to the mother: "Your thought is, if she sees a competent counselor, they will unravel all this confusion for her and the false sense of security she has in romantic relationships with women and this will be clear to her that she's straight as a string and get on with her life" is an overly-simplistic statement for an esteemed psychologist such as Dr. Phil to make.
Finally, Dr. Phil went onto say to the young woman: "given that you have been molested, that really changes who you are. It causes you to think about things differently, and when it happens at a very young age, it can create some cognitive patterns that are just inaccurate and program you to make some bad choices in your life, it creates a wound that needs healing, and you really do need help with that."
It is entirely possible that this young woman's feelings of same-sex attraction is a result of this childhood abuse, yet, Dr. Phil completely left this theory out for a politically-correct explanation to the mother that "this is who she is" – implying that her daughter was born a lesbian.
Please allow me to remind Dr. Phil what the American Psychological Association said in 2008 regarding the etiology of homosexuality:
"There is no consensus among scientists about the exact reasons that an individual develops a heterosexual, bisexual, gay, or lesbian orientation. Although much research has examined the possible genetic, hormonal, developmental, social, and cultural influences on sexual orientation, no findings have emerged that permit scientists to conclude that sexual orientation is determined by any particular factor or factors. Many think that nature and nurture both play complex roles; most people experience little or no sense of choice about their sexual orientation."
"There is no consensus among scientists about the exact reasons that an individual develops a heterosexual, bisexual, gay, or lesbian orientation. Although much research has examined the possible genetic, hormonal, developmental, social, and cultural influences on sexual orientation, no findings have emerged that permit scientists to conclude that sexual orientation is determined by any particular factor or factors. Many think that nature and nurture both play complex roles; most people experience little or no sense of choice about their sexual orientation."
For Dr. Phil to not explore ALL the possible reasons why this young woman may be experiencing homosexual feelings is to directly contradict the best evidence from scientists, and thus, mislead the general public. I am certain that he would not do this intentionally. Therefore, Voice of the Voiceless respectfully requests that Dr. Phil:
1) Publicly apologize to the ex-gay community for implying that "we do not exist" 2) Set the record straight on a future broadcast that his statement about former homosexual and the etiology of homosexuality was his opinion, not scientific fact 3) Invite myself and other former homosexuals and ex-gays, and their families, on a future episode of the Dr. Phil show so that we may tell America about our lives.
After weeks of attempting to speak with the show's producers, legal representatives, and media relations spokesperson, all we received was the following statement: " Thank you for sharing your opinions with us. Dr. Phil and his producers stand by the statements he made on this show."
This "response" is a slap in the face to the tens of thousands of former homosexuals, persons with unwanted same-sex attraction, and their families. Further, Dr. Phil's complete lack of respect for this mother's Christian values is defamatory towards the entire faith-based community who hold to traditional Biblical beliefs regarding homosexual behavior.
On the Web: www.ComingOutLoved.com/drphilpetition
__________________________________
Christopher Doyle, M.A. is the Co-Founder and Acting Director of Voice of the Voiceless. For more information, visit us online at: www.ComingOutLoved.com/VoiceoftheVoiceless
Dr. Phil is about as relevant as dog doo, he would be nothing without Oprah!
From the new powers that be....”Once you go gay then you must stay!”
Who cares about him?
He’s not licensed anymore, and even admits he’s not really practicing psychology.
Oprah attracts all kinds of people like that because it fits her views.
The scientific community claims that male homosexuals experience an absent/passive father and domineering mother. However, they can't explain away the straight men who happen to have that same combination. They can't explain away female homosexuals either.
It's a choice; that is the explanation. God made Adam and Eve, nor Adam and Steve.
[[Dr. Phil flat-out shut the mother’s opinion down, along with her Christian values, in favor for the simple explanation that “this is who her daughter is” and she should just accept it.]]
But apparently “This is how hte omther is, and hte daughter should ‘just accept it’ “ isn’t allowed by the ‘tolorant’- they can’t accept that manty peopel DO NOT APPROVE of homosexuality- nor can they bear the thought that such moral views exist- they DENY us hte right to oppose homosexuality claimign we are ‘beign narrow minded’ compeltey ignorign hte FACT that htey are beign narrow minded abotu ouir opposition
He practices SICKology, not psychology.
Oprah has always been a waste. Always will be.
Dr. Phil is a bigot.
The Communist Takeover Of
America - 45 Declared Goals
#41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.
http://rense.com/general32/americ.htm
(Hurry up, commies!)
Dr. Phil is a bigot.
That is short for his real name BIG IDIOT
Dr Phil, who?
I'm picking up Dr. Phil right now.
As with the APA, Dr. Phil is a classic pseudoscientist. He’s no more reliable for accuracy than a Romanian astrologer.
You disrespecting Romanian astrologers?
The PC storm troopers gonna be coming to knock on your door!
I bet he doesn’t complain about ex straights.
It keeps on being repeated that being gay is biological, and these new "theories" keep on being brought out. Problem is, these are just theories, NOTHING has been substantiated.
(“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”-Joseph Goebbels)
So, we have a dilema. There are numerous, tens of thousands of people, like Anne Heche, who turn their back, for one reason or another, on the gay lifestyle. How are these people able to deny something that is claimed to be biological?
Next...
IF...IF it is biological, then why isn't it viewed the same as many other biological conditions? Cleft palates, Downs syndrome, Achondroplasia, Cerebal Palsy, Marfan syndrome, Spina Bifida, chromosomal dissorders and a whole list of others.
In all of these conditions, the medical field is looking for CURES or treatments for these conditions. Meanwhile, nobody is looking for a CURE for gayness, or a treatment for it.
Its treated completely different from othe "born conditions". Maybe the reason its treated differently is because they WANT it to be treated differently.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.