Replies

“I would not call it the “ Gospel of Paul “ for the whole word of God is God’s.
The theology of Paul ? once again, Paul gained that understanding from God himself and ? Paul was well taught in the Hebrew writings, and he also was a teacher of the law.”

Don’t worry, I agree with you. I could have been clearer though originally. My position is that the “Gospel” of Paul is the same one given to us by all the Apostles, who all received the same message from God.

The “anti-Paulites,” as absurd as they are, would have to remove a whole lot more than just the works of Paul. Notice this particular thread is analyzing a chapter out of John. Thus, they would have to add to the list John the Apostle as well to those they ban. And we could keep on doing it to others, like Peter, who refer to the epistles of Paul as Holy scripture (2 Pe 3:15-16). The anti-Paulites, logically, would be left with no Bible at all at the end of the process.

Another thing those Anti-Paulines choose to forget and disregard is that the major Apostles Church elders meet with Paul and approved of his teachers and affirmed that he was the real deal.
It went even farther than that ? Peter told him that Peter would be the great Apostle over the house of Israel and Paul would be the great apostles over the gentiles.
Those anti-Paulines are wolves in sheep's clothing and are the false teachers of our day.
Can't have more of a greater stamp of approval then from God himself and from Peter and the other Apostles, I don't know how those who call Paul a false teacher can get around that one, unless ? they are lying to you.

" The “anti-Paulites,” as absurd as they are, would have to remove a whole lot more than just the works of Paul. Notice this particular thread is analyzing a chapter out of John. Thus, they would have to add to the list John the Apostle as well to those they ban. And we could keep on doing it to others, like Peter, who refer to the epistles of Paul as Holy scripture (2 Pe 3:15-16). The anti-Paulites, logically, would be left with no Bible at all at the end of the process. "

Anti-Paulines, Swiss cheese Pretzel logic.

I was even called a heretic because I said for those who are in Christ ? who trust in Christ ? for it's a utter impossibility for those who trust in Christ to ever go to hell.

Romans 8 verse 1 :
8. There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.

Oh yeah, those heretic hunters ? when Paul says ( by the way ? isn't it amazing how they cheery pick Pauls teachings to condemn and teach the salvation by the law teachings with this ? ) who walk not after the flesh, but after the spirit.
They go on how this is talking about those who walk in SIN SIN SIN ! I TELL YA SIN !

No, nope, nada, it does not talk about SIN SIN SIN SIN !

It's talking about the " carnal " human natural, i.e. human efforts, human strength.
Trying to keep the law in a effort to win or gain your salvation is being " Carnal " .
But, God's word says that the carnal mind is at war, at emmity against God.
So ? what does those who walknot after the flesh but after the spirit mean ? it mean's being spiritual, the spirit of grace.
It means ? walking in the spirit of grace, God's grace, and not in your own human reasoning and trying to keep the law or do good works.