[Wanderer99]

The multiverse hypothesis is a contrived attempt to reconcile our elegant reality with blind chance, at odds with our universal observation that reality follows one path or another, but not all paths.

Have you ever met a leftist? Are you telling me that those insane and worthless minds were specially created?

Random chance is required for the existence of free will and for the existence of things in this world which God does not like.

[metmom]

You have a pretty weak andhelpless God.

One who is not a God at all.

[YHAOS]

“Random chance is required for the existence of free will”

Why? Explain that dynamic. Are you suggesting that free will is not the product of The Creator (that is to say the God of the Judeo-Christian Tradition), but instead is the happenstance of “Random chance” (like Topsey it just growed)? Following your logic to its conclusion, are you then suggesting that the Judeo-Christian God is not at all The Creator, but is rather just another hapless outcome of random “chance” (leaving aside your misapplication of “random”). If the case, then what is the difference from any other tenet of Materialism and your particular POV?

“. . . and for the existence of things in this world which God does not like.”

What would be the significance of “free will” were it not for the existence of “things” which The Creator does not “like”?

Thanks SeekAndFind, for posting this interesting Prager article. Prager is always a fun read. I’ve called mom and boop because of their interest in this subject.