Replies

Several things about sola scriptura ~ it has it origins in an historic context, and no discussion of it should take place outside of a reference to that context. Secondly, it was developed by experts in the matter of Scriptural interpretation and understanding. They'd all been trained by other experts within the framework of the Roman Catholic church.

The modern explanation for continued Catholic opposition to or criticism of sola scriptura as a doctrine is that "The task of interpreting the Word of God authentically has been entrusted solely to the Magisterium of the Church, that is, to the Pope and to the bishops in communion with him." (taken by somebody from an catechism).

So, where does that leave us? Well, it's at that point that somebody might ask why the Catholic church would have put the Scriptures together if not as an exercise of the office or commission of the Magisterium regarding what they mean? And if so, how can those scriptures not be an accurate and inspired reflection of the Word of God, and if the Word of God, why would devout followers seek out meaning in exogenous compendiums of doctrines of all sorts?

BTW, that's just to show that virtually all claims of circular argument about sola scriptura necessarily lead back to a circular argument about the authority of the Magisterium.

BTW, in case of dispute on any given doctrine I always check on what the RC authorities have said. They do have experts in such matters and a long history, even peopled with saints, whose opinions or understandings should not be easily discarded by anyone.