Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newspaper's online image called 'blasphemous' [Catholics / Lady of Guadalupe]
KOAT 7 Albuquerque ^ | Jun 25, 2013 | Melissa Colorado

Posted on 06/25/2013 11:41:40 AM PDT by Alex Murphy

Edited on 06/25/2013 7:26:23 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

SANTA FE, N.M. —A newspaper’s recent online design, which depicts a woman who looks like Lady of Guadalupe in a bikini, has drawn controversy from Catholics across the state.

The cartoon woman in The Santa Fe Reporter's "Summer Guide 2013" issue is wearing a yellow bikini, along with a blue cloak that covers the top of her head and nothing else. Behind the woman, there are yellow sun rays. She is sipping from a margarita glass.

The cover design has angered Catholics because of the woman's uncanny resemblance to Our Lady of Guadalupe.

“I think that's very offensive,” said local Catholic David Rodke. "(The paper) seems to be posing her as the Virgin of Guadalupe. That's blasphemous!"

Alexa Schirtzinger, the editor of The Santa Fe Reporter, declined to do an interview. However, Shirtzinger posted a blog in response to the outrage over the image.

"The intent of our Summer Guide cover design was not to insult or denigrate any religion or ethnicity, but rather to incorporate an important part of Santa Fe's culture into an image that also unites other diverse cultures that flourish in our city,” Schirtzinger wrote in the blog.

Resident Terence Lente said the picture may be in poor taste, but there’s no reason to censor it.

“I can see how this could offend many people,” Lente said. “It [snip] people off but at the same time. It’s freedom of speech.”

The Santa Fe Reporter distributes close to 20,0000 copies each week to Albuquerque, Santa Fe and parts of northern New Mexico.


TOPICS: Catholic; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture; Worship
KEYWORDS: catholic; ladyofguadalupe; newmexico
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

The cartoon woman in The Santa Fe Reporter's "Summer Guide 2013" issue is wearing a yellow bikini, along with a blue cloak that covers the top of her head and nothing else. Behind the woman, there are yellow sun rays. She is sipping from a margarita glass. The cover design has angered Catholics because of the woman's uncanny resemblance to Our Lady of Guadalupe.

1 posted on 06/25/2013 11:41:40 AM PDT by Alex Murphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

And the gay cowboy is an insult to all cowboys.


2 posted on 06/25/2013 11:43:55 AM PDT by RoosterRedux (You can't eat Sharia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: Alex Murphy

Did you design the cover?


4 posted on 06/25/2013 11:44:55 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

lol!


5 posted on 06/25/2013 11:46:11 AM PDT by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
blas·phe·my noun \ˈblas-fə-mē\ plural blas·phe·mies Definition of BLASPHEMY 1. a : the act of insulting or showing contempt or lack of reverence for God b : the act of claiming the attributes of deity My understanding (based of the definition of blasphemy) is that this was not blasphemous unless Catholics want to admit she is a goddess/deity. Second, a bikini doesn't make her a non-virgin anymore. She can wear that and still be pure. Third, if you have a baby, you are medically not a virgin anymore because the hymen would have broken during delivery.
6 posted on 06/25/2013 11:46:57 AM PDT by thetallguy24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

With all due respect, seriously, I think that this fuss is over-reaching, really.


7 posted on 06/25/2013 11:49:51 AM PDT by muir_redwoods (Don't fire until you see the blue of their helmets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
The cover design has angered Catholics because of the woman's uncanny resemblance to Our Lady of Guadalupe.

How do they know what Guadalupe Lady looks like in the first place?

8 posted on 06/25/2013 11:51:15 AM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

To be fair, they should have had Mohammed in a Speedo.


9 posted on 06/25/2013 11:51:28 AM PDT by AZLiberty (No tag today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

I remember the first Dick I drew... think it was Nixon lol


10 posted on 06/25/2013 11:52:50 AM PDT by martiangohome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

When can we expect you to chop off heads and riot over this. . . oh. . .that’s right. . . never mind.


11 posted on 06/25/2013 11:53:24 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thetallguy24
My understanding (based of the definition of blasphemy) is that this was not blasphemous unless Catholics want to admit she is a goddess/deity.
Oh, hooey! When you insult the Mother of God, you ARE insulting Jesus Christ. That can't be that difficult to figure out.
12 posted on 06/25/2013 11:53:36 AM PDT by mlizzy (If people spent an hour a week in Eucharistic adoration, abortion would be ended. --Mother Teresa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

Let’s test the bravery of these “artists”.

Do that with Mohammed, sukkahs.

Oh, a bit chicken, are we?

Of course, because youze are liberals.


13 posted on 06/25/2013 11:55:14 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Did you design the cover?

Does it matter?

14 posted on 06/25/2013 11:56:53 AM PDT by Alex Murphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thetallguy24

actually point #3 would not be accurate since the church’s teachings are “By his power as God, the Savior passed through the closed womb of the Virgin Mary as light passing through glass, as thought proceeding from intellect. He did no harm to the physical integrity of our Lady’s virginal cloister, but rather consecrated it!”


15 posted on 06/25/2013 12:06:21 PM PDT by MNDude (Sorry for typos. Probably written on a smartphone, and I have big clumsy fingers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
Compare for yourself:

I claim the similarity to be an intentional slight to the primary population of the area served by the publication. Hispanic Catholics hold the Virgin of Guadelupe in very high regard, Protestant views on the relevance of the Mother of Jesus notwithstanding.

16 posted on 06/25/2013 12:08:48 PM PDT by tpmintx (Gun free zones are hunting preserves for unarmed people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

And yet many of the people doing the complaining doubtless pull the Democrat lever at every election.


17 posted on 06/25/2013 12:11:30 PM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (Ki-hagoy vehamamlakhah 'asher lo'-ya`avdukh yove'du; vehagoyim charov yecheravu!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mlizzy

When you call her the Mother of God, you are making her God the Father’s equal. She is not the Mother of God. God has no Mother. He is the Alpha and Omega, the Creator of mothers and fathers. She was merely a vassal and birth giver.

I didn’t realize the ten commandments said “do not take the Lord’s name in vain...and now Mary’s.” I would love to see you use Scripture to show how insulting Mary equated to insulting the Lord Jesus Christ, but most likely you will just counterattack rather than use a reasonable effort.

Ironically, Mary is also called the Queen of Heaven, which is also the name given Asherah (the Mother of the Gods) and Hera/Juno (the Mother of Gods).

False gods never die. They just change faces.


18 posted on 06/25/2013 12:11:38 PM PDT by thetallguy24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: thetallguy24
Third, if you have a baby, you are medically not a virgin anymore because the hymen would have broken during delivery.

A view not shared by Luther, Calvin, Zwingli, etc.

Medically, a woman can't conceive unless sperm migrates to the fallopian tube and fertilizes an egg. Do you reject that portion of Scripture that states that didn't happen?

19 posted on 06/25/2013 12:14:08 PM PDT by A.A. Cunningham (Electorate data confirms Resolute Conservative voted for Soetoro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

Birds of a feather ...


20 posted on 06/25/2013 12:14:44 PM PDT by A.A. Cunningham (Electorate data confirms Resolute Conservative voted for Soetoro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson