Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Weiss White

Good question! Another good one would be, why don’t more people seek legal annulments?


2 posted on 06/29/2013 6:06:51 AM PDT by HomeAtLast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: HomeAtLast

http://www.rosen.com/divorce/divorcearticles/when-is-annulment-an-option/

This is a discussion of the question of legal annulment in North Carolina. (Each state can have different guidelines.) Some of the criteria are similar to those involved in a Church declaration of nullity, but others are not. In particular, the law says that if a couple has lived together and had a child following the marriage, there can be no annulment, except in cases of bigamy.

A weird element: in NC, the marriage can be annulled if “either party” is impotent. That almost seems to be setting up marriage for homosexual men, since “impotence” is unique to men. A woman would have to be drastically mutilated or injured for intercourse to be impossible, whether she consents to it or not.


6 posted on 06/29/2013 6:13:24 AM PDT by Tax-chick (I want shrimp tacos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: HomeAtLast
why don’t more people seek legal annulments?

Grounds are much more limited, more proof is required, and it's going to cost a lot more than a routine divorce.

23 posted on 06/29/2013 7:26:35 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: HomeAtLast

I imagine that a legal/civil annulment is something not found in most states. I’ve never heard of it in law school, nor in any state I’ve lived in.

Can someone tell me more?

Don’t most states have liberal divorce laws that let couples divorce easily if they both agree?


27 posted on 06/29/2013 9:19:02 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Universal Background Check -> Registration -> Confiscation -> Oppression -> Extermination)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: HomeAtLast
Good question! Another good one would be, why don’t more people seek legal annulments?

I married young and we "outgrew" each other. We divorced after 12 years. I met my current wife of 38 years and we were making plans for a church wedding when the Priest informed us we would need an annulment. We asked how to go about that and he said we needed to file papers before an Ecclesiastical Court and that we could expect a decision in two to three years. We decided to go with a civil ceremony and told the Priest "thanks, but no thanks".

The 3 year estimate may have improved over the years but I doubt it improved all that much. Most people will not put up with such staggering inefficiency when there are clear alternatives.

Regards,
GtG

31 posted on 06/29/2013 12:01:57 PM PDT by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: HomeAtLast
Another good one would be, why don’t more people seek legal annulments?

Speaking for myself only, annulments in the Church may require dishonesty.

37 posted on 06/29/2013 5:59:16 PM PDT by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: HomeAtLast

I looked into annulment in VA a few years ago. There are very few reasons, and the annulment has to be moved for within two years of the ‘marriage.’

The few reasons include one or both parties being under the legal age for marriage; a blood relationship between the parties, having a child by or with another person within a brief time before or after the marriage and not telling the other person.

Most people will opt for the easier, simpler divorce, as did the person I was helping with the research.


41 posted on 06/29/2013 9:54:17 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson