Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: NYer

What I think is 1) since the archeological evidence suggests that Jericho had been sacked and abandoned about 200 years before the probable date of the Exodus, the authors of Joshua were not describing a real event, but a symbolic one; 2) the writers of the Bible were quite capable of inserting divine commands into accounts of flawed human actions, in order to justify their ancestors behavior.


29 posted on 07/25/2013 7:38:00 PM PDT by VietVet (I am old enough to know who I am and what I believe, and I 'm not inclined to apologize for any of)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: VietVet
200 years before the probable date of the Exodus

Or the probable date of Exodus is wrong. A significant problem in ancient archaeology is trying to find records. People were less literate and writing and copying a book was more expensive than it is today.

the writers of the Bible were quite capable of inserting divine commands into accounts of flawed human actions, in order to justify their ancestors behavior.

Or the events happened as described, but we cannot conceive of a loving God that would smite people in the manner presented in Tanakh. God is not bound by natural law.
46 posted on 07/31/2013 1:19:55 PM PDT by ronnietherocket3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson