Not “recreated” and not “resacrificed,” but “re-presented”; made present (to us) again, not done over again. Huge difference.
Not “recreated” and not “resacrificed,” but “re-presented”; made present (to us) again, not done over again. Huge difference.
Hmmmm interesting take... NAh! its the same thing.. Re-packaged..
I'd say that's a faulty definition...Re-present means to present again...It does not mean to make present everywhere for all time...
I can't figure out how Catholics justify this and still claim to believe the scriptures...Clearly you guys do not...The scriptures state that there was one sacrifice that took place at a specific time and that it is forever done with...
The consecration of the host is completely unbiblical...Why is it not the Resurrection that is re-presented???
I don't mind that you guys have a religion and I don't mind how you guys chose to worship...But when your religion claims its religion is the Christian religion we read about in the bible, I (we) can't just stand by and say nothing...Because it clearly is not...