First, you ARE required to take the Roman interpretation without question. That is t an argument, but an observation about why you can’t see it objectively... Nor question what you were taught.
“but an observation about why you can’t see it objectively... Nor question what you were taught.”
Two men were walking along the side of the road. One man said to the other
“I have watched you for many days and yet you do something I cannot understand. In the morning - your horse is laden and full. So you walk alongside the horse. In the evening - rather than ride your horse, you continue to walk alongside the horse rather than ride it?”
“Ride it and you’ll understand”.
So the other man walked back with the rider and the next morning, walked out with him to the market. Then the horse was laden with many goods. The rider got a good price and on the way home - the other man mounted up on the rider. Then it became obvious to him why the man did not ride the horse - for the horse had never had a rider.