It should be obvious from my posts here - starting with the first one - that I see this debate as useless on the facts. I’ve been here long enough to see them all at least a dozen times.
I know they go around in circles if any where at all.
It’s really about being against the Church. For some that is the definition of their religion that is most important and that they can share with others, no matter how divergent they are otherwise.
So, it doesn’t matter what I find or what I share in terms of facts or statistics, because the real game is to oppose no matter what. It’s that important, it is how some define themselves on the deepest level of religion.
Nothing I offer you here can change this.
The most I could hope for is that you see it as it really is.
What debate? Are you posting to the wrong person?
In post after post to me you keep doing a huge amount of mind reading and seeming to be posting to me about something else entirely than what I have posted on.
Read post 14, it is my first post on this thread, then in post 75 you responded to a post that had been made to me on that question and seemed to indicate that you saw my question answered in the links, but so far that doesn’t seem to be the case at all.
I’ll ask again.
Where are the statistics to give fathers your top billing as pedophiles and where are the statistics by jobs that lists Christian ministers as the third most likely profession in America for pedophiles?
Problem is, NO facts have been given that support the contention that FATHERS deserve top billing as most likely to be pedophiles and molest their own children.
All I see here is evasion and deflection in attempt to get people's attention off a claim that pretty clearly false since there is nothing that has been provided to support it.