This Passage In The Pope's First Major Interview Has Made A Lot Of People Very Excited

Business Insider ^ | 09/21/2013 | Adam Taylor

[SeekAndFind]

Then there’s this statement:

“A person once asked me, in a provocative manner, if I approved of homosexuality. I replied with another question: ‘Tell me: when God looks at a gay person, does he endorse the existence of this person with love, or reject and condemn this person?’ We must always consider the person. Here we enter into the mystery of the human being. In life, God accompanies persons, and we must accompany them, starting from their situation. It is necessary to accompany them with mercy. When that happens, the Holy Spirit inspires the priest to say the right thing.”

[SunkenCiv]

Thanks SeekAndFind.

[Jim Robinson]

Hate the sin, love the sinner. But homosexualism is sinful, is immoral and unhealthy and we must never endorse it.

[Viennacon]

And so lengthens the procession. He has joined the Methodists.

[nathanbedford]

As a Protestant I feel constrained against intruding into a debate among Catholics over their own theology. But when the discussion impinges on the political world and by its very nature has implications for my political freedoms, I feel perfectly free to wade in, especially to comment on a political forum with a Judeo/Christian consensus.

I wonder if the author is informed when he includes abortion on the same level with homosexuals and contraception and implicitly concludes that the Pope will change church doctrine concerning all three in what we might call a libertarian direction. I cannot understand how the test which the Pope applies, which is how God sees a person apart from the sin, can be invoked-nor do I suggest the Pope would invokesuch a test-to condone abortion.

It would be an abandonment of the very principle His Holiness endorses to condone the murder of an unborn child. The distinction, of course, is to look for a victim and where none exists to refrain from invoking the power of the state to control the behavior. That means that homosexuality and contraception are not fit subjects for governments to control.

It seems, although it is not clear, that the pope regards them as unfit subjects for the church to denounce. Whether that means that the church will condone them is another matter. My interest, as I noted above, is how the church's position impinges on my political life.

[SeekAndFind]

RE: It seems, although it is not clear, that the pope regards them as unfit subjects for the church to denounce.

I wonder why homosexuality and abortion are unfit to denounce.

The logic seems simple enough -— The church believes in the Bible as God’s word, God’s word condemns both homosexuality AND murder. Therefore, what follows for the church ??

It is right to say “Neither do I condemn you” (John 8:11)... but if the church stops there and ignore the next statement, then it is not preaching the complete Gospel.

[Hostage]

Did he really use the word ‘gay’? That word has been stolen from traditional society where it was used to connote joy, happiness, light frivolity.

[SeekAndFind]

RE: Did he really use the word ‘gay’?

Those words were translated into English.

[Hostage]

Translated from what language?

In Spanish the word is also homosexual. In Latin it is homosexualis. In Italian it is omosessuale.

The word ‘gay’ means lighthearted and carefree, a happy-go-lucky disposition. The meaning of gay as homosexual is a new phenomenon. It should be taken back by injecting popular culture with its historic meaning. For example, “the Pope was in gay spirits today as he met with ...”.

The homosexual lobby plays word games. Homosexual Civil Unions and Homosexual Partnerships become Homosexual Marriage becomes Gay Marriage becomes Marriage Equality.

They should not be allowed to infringe on language any more than they be allowed to exaggerate their numbers (e.g. 1% to 10%).

[Salvation]

http://www.americamagazine.org/pope-interview

Complete text

[Salvation]

*8joined the Methodists.**

What do you mean?

Did you read the entire interview? Link above.

[noinfringers2]

Question! What feelings/attitude/judgement is proper as to the sinner who promotes the sin?

[noinfringers2]

Question! What feelings/attitude/judgement is proper as to the sinner who promotes the sin?

[HomeAtLast]

That "one passage in particular..." “The dogmatic and moral teachings of the church are not all equivalent. The church’s pastoral ministry cannot be obsessed with the transmission of a disjointed multitude of doctrines to be imposed insistently. Proclamation in a missionary style focuses on the essentials, on the necessary things: this is also what fascinates and attracts more, what makes the heart burn, as it did for the disciples at Emmaus. We have to find a new balance; otherwise even the moral edifice of the church is likely to fall like a house of cards, losing the freshness and fragrance of the Gospel. The proposal of the Gospel must be more simple, profound, radiant. It is from this proposition that the moral consequences then flow."

I have no idea what he's saying there. None. And that's not good. It sounds like babble, that can be interpreted to mean just about anything. From anyone else I'd call it bravosierra. When it comes from the Pope, I just don't know what to make of it.

[NKP_Vet]

Trying to break through the slanted, liberal media and their fixations on abortion, unnatural marriage and and sodomy.

A new and extensive interview with Pope Francis is making headlines around the world.

The New York Times initially headlined its story, “Pope Bluntly Faults Church’s Focus on Gays and Abortion.”

USA Today declared: “Pope seeks less focus on abortion, gays, contraception.”

And CBS News proclaimed: “Pope Francis: Catholic Church must focus beyond ‘small-minded rules.’”

Wow! Did the Pope really characterize the Church’s teachings on abortion, homosexuality and contraception as “small-minded rules” that the Church should get beyond?

That’s what you’d think by scanning the headlines, but the short answer is that the Pope said no such thing. Once again, this was a case of the secular press hyperventilating and taking the Pope’s remarks out of context.

Read more: http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/pope-francis-focuses-on-the-bigger-picture-with-new-interview/#ixzz2fYuzasdG

[Jim Robinson]

Yup. The liberals think nothing of printing lie after lie after lie in an attempt to advance their godless socialist agenda.

[Mrs. Don-o]

What do youmean Viennacon? Pope Francis hasn't even remotely joined the Methodists, if you mean pro-choice, sodomy-affirming, and post-Biblical.

All in all, as I witness this media debacle, what I hate more than even the MSM's selecting, cropping and framing of papal images and sound-bites, is their cheap, shallow, cynical political language.

"In a sop to doctrinal reactionaries in Jerusalem, Jesus of Nazareth today voiced support for the so-called 'Ten' 'Commandments'. This is widely interpreted by faith experts as a compromise designed to quiet critics who say he has slid too far in his rhetoric about mercy and grace."

I'm rolling my eyes so far I can see the front of my brain.

Tagline.

[Salvation]

http://www.americamagazine.org/pope-interview

Complete text

[Jeff Chandler]

The problem with vague language is the individual can interpret it to mean whatever is preferred, not unlike the Vatican II documents.