[boatbums]

I have no problem with some one believing that the brothers of Jesus was Marys sons but don,t believe it should become Church doctrine. I do not believe in building Church doctrine around the most popular assumptions because regardless of how sensible it may seem it could be wrong. If it is something that is a matter of life or death then i would look at it a little different but which ever side is right on this issue would not change anything even if it could be proven beyond doubt.

I think a valid question to ask Catholics about this point is, "If Mary can be shown to have had additional children with her husband, Joseph, after Jesus was born, would it effect their views about her and how would it?". In other words, how much a part of Mariology IS her perpetual virginity? If she can be shown to have had a normal, divinely-approved sexual relationship with her husband that produced other children, WHY would she be thought of or honored differently? How is the view of her changed?

[Tax-chick]

"If Mary can be shown to have had additional children with her husband, Joseph, after Jesus was born ...

Shown HOW? Delivery-room home videos?

[ravenwolf]

WHY would she be thought of or honored differently? How is the view of her changed?

---

I see the point, i can,t see how it would make any difference.