[Vigilanteman]

I was not. It is a great article which sums things up pretty nicely. Of course, the hyper-Calvinists (see post #51) will huff and puff and justify their hatred of any dissenting brand with any convenient excuse. They will also pooh-pooh the points of the article by saying that this or that point doesn't apply to them.

In short, they expect every criticism of their narrow dogma to be 100% accurate 100% of the time while giving themselves the luxury of excommunicating anyone from the body of Christianity who doesn't agree with them 100% of the time. It sort of reminds me of the liberal dogmatists, just that their articles of faith are different.

[Gamecock]

Not hardly.

Reviewing her page shows she is a theological midget and a tremendous legalist.

If you want to cling to her poorly developed rants, have at it.

There are far better anti-Calvinst arguments out there than this nonsense.