To: matthewrobertolson
“Second, the passage undermines individual interpretation, the cornerstone of the Protestant doctrine of Sola Scriptura, implicitly reminding us of the necessity of being united under one set of doctrines. “
So interpretation by one man is bad, but interpretation by another is good?
2 posted on
09/25/2013 6:21:27 AM PDT by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: driftdiver
So interpretation by one man is bad, but interpretation by another is good? Now you are getting it ... do not seek to understand the scriptures ... just believe what the RCC tells you they mean ...
You sir ... are almost "home" ... < /sarc>
4 posted on
09/25/2013 6:32:28 AM PDT by
dartuser
To: driftdiver
Second, the passage undermines individual interpretation, the cornerstone of the Protestant doctrine of Sola Scriptura, implicitly reminding us of the necessity of being united under one set of doctrines. So interpretation by one man is bad, but interpretation by another is good?
LOL! The whole article is an exercise in "individual interpretation".
9 posted on
09/25/2013 6:57:31 AM PDT by
Alex Murphy
(Just a common, ordinary, simple savior of America's destiny.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson