[Mrs. Don-o]

Your statement, lovedsinner, did not make sense before, with its allusion to 100,000 dead and the Pope should resign (a strange non-sequitur). It makes even less sense now, with its reference to millions dying in the future and the Pope "may be responsible."

You think he's AGAINST banning chemical weapons?

You seem to have mixed him up with somebody else -- oh, I don't know --- Putin, who now controls the U.N. Security Council?

Or maybe Iran's President Rouhani --- Assad's sponsor -- who Obama's negotiating on the phone with?

Amazing how the Pope can get blame, now, for future millions of people dead, just for doing what men of God do: urging us to pray for peace.

Don't we pray for the peace of Jerusalem all the time?

And don't you think that includes opposition to chemical weapons? After all, indiscriminate attacks killing civilians are expressly forbidden by the Church: they are called "crimes against God and humanity" in the Catholic Catechism. Not that anybody listens.

[Mrs. Don-o]

You have any idea what this is all about?

[BlueDragon]

a strange non-sequitur

Yeah, it did not follow. I'm not sure how it could be near enough to begin following...much less catch up = Francis resign now (?)