Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House approves resolution to allow Mass on military installations during shutdown
The Deacon's Bench ^ | October 5, 2013 | Deacon Greg Kandra

Posted on 10/05/2013 2:22:24 PM PDT by NYer

This just in, from the Archdiocese for the Military Services:

The United States House of Representatives today voted 400-1 to pass House Concurrent Resolution 58 calling on Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel to allow the continued performance of religious services on military installations during the government shutdown. The resolution was introduced by Congressman Doug Collins (R-Ga.) in response to an Oct. 3 op-ed by Mr. John Schlageter, General Counsel of the Archdiocese for the Military Services, USA (AMS) in which he disclosed that non-active duty Catholic priests have been ordered not to work—or even volunteer—on military installations for the duration of the shutdown, making it impossible for servicemen and women at some locations to attend Mass this weekend.

Mr. Schlageter wrote:

“At a time when the military is considering alternative sources of funding for sporting events at the service academies, no one seems to be looking for funding to ensure the Free Exercise rights of Catholics in uniform. Why not?”

After the vote, Congressman Collins, himself a U.S. Air Force chaplain and Iraq war veteran, said:

“We have a Bill of Rights for a reason—that no matter the fiscal condition of the federal government, the rights of the people are guaranteed. This is a week that has seen veterans denied their right to assemble at our national monuments, travelers denied access to roads their hard-earned dollars have paid for, and now chaplains ordered to stop providing religious services to those who are selflessly willing to lay down their lives for ours… Congress is duty bound to act as quickly as possible to protect the rights of the American people, and I am proud that we did so today.”

Specifically, H. Con. Res. 58 “recognizes that the performance of religious Services and the provision of ministry are protected activities under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution; urges and intends that the Secretary of Defense permit the performance of religious services on property owned or maintained by the Department of Defense, during any lapse in appropriations, in the same manner and to the same extent as such religious services are otherwise available; and urges and intends that the Secretary of Defense permit military chaplains and other personnel, including contract personnel, hired to perform duties of a military chaplain to perform religious services and ministry, during any lapse in appropriations, in the same manner and to the same extent as such chaplains and other personnel are otherwise permitted to perform religious services and ministry.”

His Excellency, the Most Reverend Timothy P. Broglio, J.C.D., Archbishop for the Military Services, expressed appreciation for Congressman Collins’ stand in defense of religious freedom.

Archbishop Broglio said:

“Military personnel enjoy, like all Americans, the First Amendment guarantee of the ‘Free Exercise’ of religion. In the current political climate, however, nothing can be taken for granted. I am grateful to Representative Collins and the many other House members who recognized the importance of passing this resolution, which reflects the seriousness with which the American people take their Free Exercise rights. It can only be hoped that the members of the US Senate will act decisively in order to favor the same First Amendment rights.”



TOPICS: Catholic; Current Events; Religion & Politics; Worship
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: reagandemocrat

Enyart


21 posted on 10/05/2013 4:41:14 PM PDT by Excellence (All your database are belong to us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Excellence

Sorry about the double post.


22 posted on 10/05/2013 4:41:42 PM PDT by Excellence (All your database are belong to us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Thank goodness. I think our side a starting to get it. Do not take for granted that this president will view Christian faiths as most our other presidents did,as an actively devout churchgoer or as a benign administrator, who wished to keep his constituents happy. That is not what we’re dealing with right now. We have to admit the truth and be ready to lawfully, forcefully push back when he cuts too close. Even if we lose a topic or two, let them know to expect active, enthusiastic resistance from the real American people.


23 posted on 10/05/2013 4:42:09 PM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reagandemocrat
Who voted against it??

Besides the guy who voted against it, 400-1 means that 34 of the 435 members of the House abstained, or chose not to be present for the vote.

24 posted on 10/05/2013 4:45:37 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Big Whoop,The priest’s would have said Mass anyway.


25 posted on 10/05/2013 4:48:24 PM PDT by fatima (Free Hugs Today :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Good! I assume this is pertinent to all military pastors.


26 posted on 10/05/2013 4:57:25 PM PDT by Gumdrop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104

27 posted on 10/05/2013 5:22:51 PM PDT by NYer ("The wise man is the one who can save his soul. - St. Nimatullah Al-Hardini)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NYer

The only vote against was from William Enyart, a freshman ‘Rat from the downstate Illinois district which includes East St. Louis.

Those not voting were:

Bass
Cárdenas
DeGette
Duncan (TN)
Hahn
Herrera Beutler
Higgins
Johnson, Sam
Jones
Labrador
Lummis
McCarthy (NY)
Miller, Gary
Pascrell
Perry
Peterson
Pittenger
Rangel
Renacci
Rohrabacher
Roskam
Rush
Sanchez, Loretta
Smith (TX)
Thompson (MS)
Tipton
Vargas
Walz
Yarmuth
Young (FL)


28 posted on 10/05/2013 11:06:23 PM PDT by nd76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson