Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

I believe the salvation of our immortal souls should be our real concern.
1 posted on 10/24/2013 7:57:58 AM PDT by rwa265
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
To: rwa265
Moreover I believe the real pain of not recognizing the legitimacy of same-sex couples ought to be our real concern.

Uhhhh...no.

Avoiding the burning depths of hell for eternity is the real concern.

2 posted on 10/24/2013 7:59:22 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Obama is so far in over his head, even his ears are beneath the water level.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwa265

Bible first then mans law next.


3 posted on 10/24/2013 8:00:49 AM PDT by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwa265

Another wolf in sheep’s clothing.


4 posted on 10/24/2013 8:01:20 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwa265

What a moron. This guy shouldn’t be taken seriously if this is his rationale.


5 posted on 10/24/2013 8:02:04 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwa265

I had to read through it to see what flawed “reasons” were given. The author tried to say she was using biblical text, but failed miserably. It was all humanist tripe.

The purpose of marriage is to produce Godly offspring (Malachi 2:15).
There is no chance of that happening in a same-sex union.


6 posted on 10/24/2013 8:03:12 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwa265

This man is satanic. Should be sued for using the name ‘Baptist’.


7 posted on 10/24/2013 8:03:17 AM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwa265
NO ... and here's why:

Just Christians

Its message to those who, in abandonment of hope, define themselves by some sin, and present themselves as though they, as so defined, should have a place in the Church, is and only can be that of complete rejection. With respect to loving the sinner and hating the sin, which it indeed is called to do, what can it say to those who, in contempt of the saints who have fled their sins, declare their persons to be inseparable from the sin, identifying themselves with it—and then blame the Church for hating them as persons? It can only say to them that all perversion of what it is to be human has been destroyed in and by Christ, who makes those who love him straight and whole after his own image. To some, this is the promise of life; to others, who have bound themselves to that which is to be destroyed, it is the intolerable threat of destruction.

8 posted on 10/24/2013 8:04:15 AM PDT by MissMagnolia (You see, truth always resides wherever brave men still have ammunition. I pick truth. (John Ransom))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwa265; All

When the two bulls in my neighbor’s pasture start romancing each other, I’ll rethink my position in this matter.


10 posted on 10/24/2013 8:04:48 AM PDT by davisfh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwa265

What about animal buggery? Should that also be recognized as sporting????


11 posted on 10/24/2013 8:05:09 AM PDT by firebasecody (Orthodoxy, proclaiming the Truth since AD 33)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwa265
Its been clear for years now that a lot of people have gotten into the ministries for reasons other than simply spreading the word of God.

Here appears to be one such person. He's far too well versed in Gay propaganda for it to be the recent epiphany he is presenting it as.

14 posted on 10/24/2013 8:05:58 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwa265

This guy believes that ‘gay marriage’ is possible, but since the state he is in doesn’t recognize them he has to travel out of state to perform these ‘gay marriages.’

I wonder if he would travel out of state to perform baptisms or actual marriages if the state he was in didn’t recognize those things either, or made them illegal.

Freegards


15 posted on 10/24/2013 8:06:14 AM PDT by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwa265
Moreover I believe the real pain of not recognizing the legitimacy of same-sex couples ought to be our real concern

As opposed to not telling people the truth an putting their souls at risk? Lot more pain in that.

The Golden rule test? That is giving people what they want or what they need? If I'm on the path to damnation I wuld hope someone would pull me aside and gently rebuke me. Not endorse my folly. That is the Golden Rule.

16 posted on 10/24/2013 8:06:15 AM PDT by Gamecock (Many Atheists take the stand: "There is no God AND I hate Him.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwa265

That’s L.G.B.T.Q.I.A. This man is obviously a QIA bigot.


19 posted on 10/24/2013 8:07:54 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwa265
I believe the real pain of not recognizing the legitimacy of same-sex couples ought to be our real concern.
Upyours, "pastor."
22 posted on 10/24/2013 8:09:05 AM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwa265

So then should this Bible verse “1 Corinthians 7:3
The husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife, and likewise the wife to her husband.” should apply to them?

Just think for a second how sick the conclusions you must reach as soon as you accept homosexual marriage.


24 posted on 10/24/2013 8:12:19 AM PDT by MNDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwa265

One positive thing about issues like this is that they help us separate the wheat from the tares.


26 posted on 10/24/2013 8:12:53 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwa265

Never say never just went out the window.

Never!


30 posted on 10/24/2013 8:14:48 AM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwa265

Any religion that regards two homo pervs, two feces-freaks, as the equal to a husband-and-wife, is a religion that isn’t worth spit. Ditto for any government that embraces such depravity.


33 posted on 10/24/2013 8:18:24 AM PDT by greene66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwa265
I believe the salvation of our immortal souls should be our real concern.

Yup

I agree with most of the other comments on this thread. Encouraging people to take the path to destruction because it 'feels right at the moment' is cruel. Give a heroin addict a lifetime supply of heroin and needles while you are at it.

34 posted on 10/24/2013 8:19:32 AM PDT by El Cid (Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwa265

Who is this jerk? Christians should support same-sex marriage? No way, we cannot. For to do so, would negate the sacrifice of Christ and say that it is meaningless!~

This guy isn’t a Christian.


35 posted on 10/24/2013 8:20:43 AM PDT by JSDude1 (Is John Boehner the Neville Chamberlain of American Politics?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson