Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Have you taken this homosexuality fact-checker quiz yet? Try it...you'll like it.
1 posted on 11/02/2013 7:24:32 AM PDT by James R. Aist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: James R. Aist

Conveniently located on your blog.


2 posted on 11/02/2013 7:26:44 AM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: James R. Aist

Over 80% of homosexuals were sexually abused as children.

What else do you need to know when arguing against the “born gay” nonsense?


3 posted on 11/02/2013 7:36:31 AM PDT by G Larry (Let his days be few; and let another take his office. Psalms 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: James R. Aist

“The Bible does not condemn “same-sex attractions” as sin.”

If Christ said that to lust after a woman is to commit adultery with her in your heart was a sin, is there a point that a “same sex attraction” also becomes sin, even if the “act” never occurs? Is a simple opposite sex attraction also a sin, or at what point does that attraction become pure lust(and therefore sin)?


4 posted on 11/02/2013 7:36:59 AM PDT by mdmathis6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: James R. Aist
I read the article: good stuff. Thanks for putting it up.

Homo/bi/a-sexuality is a choice as we were created heterosexual.
God made Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve.

7 posted on 11/02/2013 7:46:18 AM PDT by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: James R. Aist

took it and find I agree with most—but not all of his answers. I remain convinced one cannot be born again Christian (born anew/born from above) and claim equally to be homosexual for one is dead to the world as signified in baptism and born anew —a new creation the old things are passed away.But it may all just be a question of semantics.


10 posted on 11/02/2013 7:48:13 AM PDT by Robert Burkholder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: James R. Aist

How about a fact checker on IF this sect called ‘born again’ is Biblical?


11 posted on 11/02/2013 7:55:32 AM PDT by Just mythoughts (Jesus said Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: James R. Aist

Many people are attributing today’s political climate vis-a-vis Christian bashing as being anti-Christian. That’s not the point nor the objective.

The eventual goal is to bring society to the moral tipping point and utterly destroy and replace religious based moral aptitude with government created moral turpitude.

Think about this: Increasing population, diminishing resources. What’s the eventual outcome? When does the inflection occur? Who will suffer? Who will prosper?


14 posted on 11/02/2013 8:27:35 AM PDT by Usagi_yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: James R. Aist
Great post on an important topic.

I would much rather read something like this than the soul rotting garbage spewed out by the mass media.

Great set of links too! Here is an example of one that I enjoyed.

rethinkingtheology - Links Between Homosexuality and Pedophilia

Thank you for taking the time to share this excellent alternative to the poison that is typically served up by our minders.
24 posted on 11/02/2013 9:46:03 AM PDT by wizkid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: James R. Aist
This is better than I thought it would be. Don't know about this one, though:

God gives “same-sex attractions” to some people, making them homosexual.

That's a theological assertion, not a biological one. You can't disprove it by arguing that homosexual attraction isn't innate or hereditary (indeed, innate and hereditary aren't quite the same thing either, as all the recent talk about epigenetics indicates).

In any case, you can't reduce God to DNA. When people say God did something, they aren't necessarily saying that it's an unavoidable result of something material that science can identify or explain.

25 posted on 11/02/2013 9:59:06 AM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: James R. Aist

The only thing i can think of with out first looking up scripture is that God destroyed two cities because of men lusting after each other, i do not see any scripture of this happening because of a man and woman lusting after each other even though that has been the case since Adam and Eve.

If there were no lust between a man and woman how could we expect to multiply?

So, no i do not believe it is the same thing.

Homosexuality is an abomination, it is a sin against nature,
Just the same as worshiping idols, can anyone worship idols and believe in God at the same time?

It is not the homosexuals that bother many people, it is their Agenda which separate them from God.


27 posted on 11/02/2013 10:16:25 AM PDT by ravenwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: James R. Aist

Written to the church in Pergamos
Rev 2
14 But I have a few things against thee, because thou hast there them that hold the doctrine of Balaam, who taught Balac to cast a stumblingblock before the children of Israel, to eat things sacrificed unto idols, and to commit fornication.

15 So hast thou also them that hold the doctrine of the Nicolaitanes, which thing I hate.

16 Repent; or else I will come unto thee quickly, and will fight against them with the sword of my mouth.


In this type of situation the only way a church could repent would be to kick these people out of the Church.

Also
1 Corinthians 5:1
It is reported commonly that there is fornication among you, and such fornication as is not so much as named among the Gentiles, that one should have his father’s wife.

5 To deliver such an one unto Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus.

11 But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolator, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat.


Unless they kick him out of the Church they will have to keep company with him.


64 posted on 11/02/2013 8:46:04 PM PDT by ravenwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: James R. Aist

James some friendly advice brother. Next time put an article like the above in a caucus forum. This will keep the Romans from using troll tactics to spam your thread. I know you kept it open in good faith, and that is commendable. However some are still hunting for Luther’s bones to put him on trial and burn his remains:)

Good article.


69 posted on 11/03/2013 12:53:29 AM PDT by redleghunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: James R. Aist
“The Bible does not condemn “same-sex attractions” as sin.”

The Apostle Paul refers to them as "vile affections". Sound's like a condemnation as sin to me.

71 posted on 11/03/2013 4:48:16 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson