Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Noble

The matter at issue was that his attitude was: “Sure I did it. Why is this even a problem?” His attitude betrayed that he simply had no conception of what a Christian marriage was when he took his vows.


35 posted on 11/30/2013 12:28:38 PM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: wideawake
His attitude betrayed that he simply had no conception of what a Christian marriage was when he took his vows.

If this was correct, then protestant marriages in a church which professes that divorce is OK would be automatically null, which, I can tell you, is not the case.

Look, I respect what the Church is trying to accomplish with the annulment process. However, the enormous demand for annulments has created a new situation, which the Church in the US has tried to manage by making divorced and remarried persons go through the process, but with virtual certainty that the annulment will be granted, as long as the plaintiff professes defective intent and unless doing so would cause scandal.

If the only annulments that were granted were for judirically null marriages, tens of thousands of Catholic and would-be Catholic families would be denied the sacrament. If current practice keeps up, the cynicism and hypocrisy involved will corrupt the persons involved.

IF the pope and the bishops want to get rid of the status quo, can you blame them?

37 posted on 11/30/2013 12:58:37 PM PST by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson