I think it is called opinion. But you are right. Pointless for me to say “’tis” but also for you to say “’taint,” when neither of us can offer facts in rebuttal. As for myself, I am drawing on memory for monographs about voting of the post war elections, up to about 1965, and supposition thereafter. But you are in denial if you can’t see that the thinking of Catholics before, say. 1968, and afterwards was radically different. Who would have guessed, for instance, that a devout order of nuns in Southern California would turn into anabaptists as a result of their clash with the cardinal archbishop or that many others and many priests would be radicalized and the authority of the hierarchy virtually rejected by men determined to subvert that authority, including some of its members.
This is crazy, you can't make up fake statistics like you did, post them as fact, start a song and dance when we request to see your source for the claim, claim that you didn't make them up, and then continue the song and dance, finally admit that you made them up, and now start challenge me to prove they are fake.
I am very sure now that you are the guy who has pulled this before with these fake statistics, and your dishonesty led to the same reaction that I am getting from you now.
The mods can require a source for things posted as fact, I hope they do that with you.