Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Syncro
No, what I have said, at least 20 times in this thread, is that giving the victim the opportunity to consent that was denied her by the rapist is what is OK.

I have never said that abortion is OK. What is not OK is forcing a rape victim to bear the child of the rapist.

If the victim chooses to abort the child, then that decision is hers to bear, but it IS her choice to make, and I don't see that changing at all. If the victim decides to bear the child and then adopt it out, that is her decision to make, and I don't see that changing at all. If the victim decides to bear the child and raise it, that is her decision to make, and I don't see that changing at all.

Really, it's her decision to make, and whatever she decides is the outcome, and you're not going to take that power away from her no matter how much you may want to.

Best you can do is hope to influence that decision in a positive manner, which is what I have accurately stated all along. It's not my fault you and most others her cannot recognize or accept simple reality.

I have bolded these things, because really I'm tired of saying the same things over and over to people who appear incapable of understanding simple English.

I have never once said that I am for dead babies, really, try to get that through your skull. Are dead babies going to happen? Yeah, doesn't mean I'm for it though.

Much as you try to paint gray over with black and white, gray still remains, period.

349 posted on 02/22/2014 10:37:42 PM PST by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies ]


To: chris37
...giving the victim the opportunity to consent that was denied her by the rapist is what is OK.

The consent that is needed is the consent of the baby to be killed. To prevent the "silent scream."

Being as the baby can't advocate for his/herself millions of Pro Life people do it.

Murdering the innocent to appease the victim of the crime of rape is murder period.

She should be given the consent to kill the rapist instead of her unborn innocent kid.

Ethyl Waters is grateful her white mother didn't kill her in the womb because she was raped (while she was a teenager) by a black man.

The absence of the shame and guilt felt by the majority of those that aborted their children would be a great reward for this mother to be if she was "forced" to give birth to her child.

There is a great chance she would be grateful in the future for that "forced" life saving action.

Most women are conned into thinking their baby in the womb is just a mass of cells, not a human. They are lied to so the abortion industry can make their billions. Yes, it is a multi BILLION dollar business.

Really, it's her decision to make...

Better it would be to give her permission to kill the criminal rapist instead of maybe a future Beethoven or Waters.

Oh but that would be murder, right?

It's not my fault you and most others her cannot recognize or accept simple reality.

The reality is that killing a baby in the womb is murder. That is the most important "reality" in this situation.

I have never once said that I am for dead babies, really, try to get that through your skull. [Speaking of a skull, you are aware that a woman can get an abortion at nine months by allowing a "health care worker" to stick sissors in the baby's skull and suck the brain out aren't you?] Are dead babies going to happen? Yeah, doesn't mean I'm for it though.

No, but you appear to be just fine with enabling it, just the same if someone gave you a gun and asked you to kill an innocent person. That someone would be just as guilty of murder as you if you did as asked according to our laws.

350 posted on 02/23/2014 10:17:37 AM PST by Syncro (So? -Andrew Breitbart [1969-2012] RIP King of The New Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson