Your posts, views and sources are at the least partial prederist. Post millennials focus on the allegory or historicism of prophecies. Your presentation is a mixed bag of literal when it suits with symbolism and allegory filling in the blanks when a literal interpretation does not fit. Resulting in a convoluted shifting hermeneutic.
>>>Your posts, views and sources are at the least partial prederist. Post millennials focus on the allegory or historicism of prophecies.<<<
Show me.
>>>Your presentation is a mixed bag of literal when it suits with symbolism and allegory filling in the blanks when a literal interpretation does not fit. Resulting in a convoluted shifting hermeneutic.<<<
Is that not the way all interpretation of the scripture occurs? Do you think Scofield did not use figurative interpretation when it suited him?
In any case, I welcome more than just your opinion. Please show me the error of my ways from the scripture. I will be forever grateful.
Philip