I see; when you support Preterism you have no problem taking things literally, or spiritually, or whatever works best; It is as if the gospel you believe first and foremost is Preterism itself and everything is secondary to that equation. That is the way your comments come across to me. Were Daniel's 70 weeks contiguous or interrupted ?
>>>I see; when you support Preterism you have no problem taking things literally, or spiritually, or whatever works best<<<
And you don’t? Give me a break.
>>>Were Daniel’s 70 weeks contiguous or interrupted?<<<
Suppose you tell me. Are they contiguous or is there a gap?
Philip