Posted on 03/03/2014 10:05:08 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Oral arguments in a lawsuit by an atheist organization against the placement of the "World Trade Center cross" at a museum on government property will take place later this week.
American Atheists will present their case before the Second Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday, arguing that the WTC cross does not belong in a museum on government leased property.
Two days after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, construction workers found a cross beam among the wreckage of the Twin Towers.
Measuring 17 feet tall and approximately 4,000 pounds, the piece of debris became known as the World Trade Center cross, and for many, became a symbol of hope amid despair.
When the World Trade Center Memorial Foundation completed its national 9/11 Memorial and Museum in 2011, the WTC cross was included among the items displayed.
In July 2011, American Atheists filed suit against the museum for having the WTC cross and for reportedly lacking other secular and religious images of a non-Christian nature.
The suit was filed before the New York Supreme Court, County of New York, and named among its defendants the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, the 9/11 Museum, and New Jersey Governor Chris Christie.
"The installation of the cross at the 9/11 Memorial and Museum is facially violative of the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America," reads the suit in part.
"The challenged cross constitutes an unlawful attempt to promote a specific religion on governmental land, diminishing the civil rights, privileges or capacities of atheist Americans, agnostic Americans, Jewish Americans, Muslim Americans, and all others who are not Christian Americans."
The suit garnered much attention from various individuals and groups, including the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, which filed an amicus brief on behalf of the museum.
"Though the museum is a private foundation making a private decision, the American Atheists alleged that no religious symbol should ever be allowed on property leased by the government," stated the Becket Fund.
"Over and over again groups like the American Atheists have tried removing all traces of religion from the public square. Now they want to go so far as scrubbing it from our nation's history."
Last March, federal Judge Deborah Batts of the Southern District of New York ruled in favor of the WTC cross, arguing that its historical importance outweighed any church-state concerns.
Then get every trace of Islam out of there too.
These atheists wont be happy till their religion has been established as the only religion that can be presented in the public square.
The Cross EMERGED from the debris.
No one PUT it there, except maybe God.
RE: No one PUT it there, except maybe God.
The atheists would of course, call it “chance” ( practically their god ).
Even if it were “Chance”, it is part of the narrative of 9/11, as much as other iconic scenes (such as the Photo of the Flag raising), and absolutely should not be challenged.
The fact that the article does not specify if the government property in question is federal or states indicates that somebody doesn't understand 10th Amendment-protected state power to address religious issues. And even if it was federal property, since the Supreme Court building has religious-related artwork, why can't other federal properties have religious-related artwork?
Also, the cross in question was not made for the purpose of being a Christian cross. So the interpretation of the cross as a Christian cross is entirely subjective.
The fact that the article does not specify if the government property in question is federal or states indicates that somebody doesn't understand 10th Amendment-protected state power to address religious issues. And even if it was federal property, since the Supreme Court building has religious-related artwork, why can't other federal properties have religious-related artwork?
Also, the cross in question was not made for the purpose of being a Christian cross. So the interpretation of the cross as a Christian cross is entirely subjective.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.