Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: SpirituTuo
Because of these comments of yours:

Unity is a requirement of the Church, and any intentionally actions to create disunity are forbidden. Having read some comments about the Franciscan case, and now this case, a concern mentioned was that those offering the Tridentine Mass were using the form as a sort of protest, almost a passive-aggressive statement. If, and a big if, that is the case, it would make sense for the local ordinary to forbid it use, by the “offending” parties, though not for the diocese as a whole.

12 posted on 03/09/2014 12:53:21 PM PDT by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: piusv

Let’s stick to the case in question.

Regarding Vatican II, are you a sedevacantist, or do you just disagree with its outcomes?

If you are a sedevacantist, there is no point in this discussion. If you aren’t, then your questions about unity in Vatican II are not relevant in this case.

Either way, the issue under consideration is one college and one bishop.


13 posted on 03/09/2014 1:15:11 PM PDT by SpirituTuo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson