Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: don-o

I would be fine with the hybrid missal of 1965. It simply followed VII instructions to introduce some vernacular while employing a straight translation of the 1962 missal. It didn’t create a “banal, fabricated liturgy” (Cardinal Ratzinger’s description, not mine) out of thin air as happened with the 1970 missal of Paul VI.


22 posted on 03/10/2014 6:06:08 AM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Brian Kopp DPM

Interesting. I just googled “missal of 1965” and found it complete on line.

http://www.ccwatershed.org/media/pdfs/13/11/15/17-54-56_0.pdf


25 posted on 03/10/2014 6:29:36 AM PDT by don-o (He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson