Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Some Australian Bishops Suggest Restoring Year-Round Friday Abstinence
Catholic News Service ^ | 3/17/14 | Matthew Biddle

Posted on 03/18/2014 5:53:22 AM PDT by marshmallow

PERTH, Australia (CNS) -- Several Australian bishops said they would support re-establishment of year-round Friday abstinence in Australia, following the lead of England and Wales.

Auxiliary Bishop Peter Elliott of Melbourne, Bishop Geoffrey Jarrett of Lismore and Bishop Michael Kennedy of Armidale are among prelates who said they support Friday abstinence from meat -- without sanction of sin -- almost 30 years after it became non-compulsory in Australia.

In 2011, the Catholic bishops of England and Wales restored Friday abstinence.

Friday penance regulations in England and Wales were relaxed in 1985, as they were in Australia, allowing Catholics to perform an alternative form of penance. U.S. bishops ended obligatory abstinence in 1966.

Looking back at the decision to end Friday abstinence in Australia, Bishop Elliott said it was a "big pastoral and spiritual mistake."

"I can understand why that happened, in the mood of that era, but I believe it failed to take into account human psychology," he said.

Friday abstinence was a universal practice that Catholics were obliged to fulfill under pain of sin until Pope Paul VI issued his apostolic constitution on penance in 1966. The document gave bishops, acting through their episcopal conferences, the ability to establish the norms "they consider the most opportune and efficacious" in regards to fasting and abstinence.

(Excerpt) Read more at catholicnews.com ...


TOPICS: Catholic; Ministry/Outreach; Theology
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 03/18/2014 5:53:22 AM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

What about the American bishops?


2 posted on 03/18/2014 5:59:36 AM PDT by Biggirl (“Go, do not be afraid, and serve”-Pope Francis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Anyone check to see if they’ve recently taken positions in Gorton’s and Mrs. Paul’s?


3 posted on 03/18/2014 6:11:50 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Where in the Bible does it say not to eat meat on Fridays?


4 posted on 03/18/2014 6:13:27 AM PDT by Mr. K (If you like your constitution, you can keep it...Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

I think the Church should worry more about getting the faithful to understand Christ’s teachings, than coming up with more rules to drive people away.


5 posted on 03/18/2014 6:15:50 AM PDT by LibFreeUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

IIRC, England (Anglican Church) at one time designated 2 days a week as fish days to help out the fishing industry. It wasn’t penance. Maybe 200-300 years ago. I no longer have the book but remember it because I’m Catholic and it caught my eye.


6 posted on 03/18/2014 6:17:04 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Read my Post 6.


7 posted on 03/18/2014 6:17:56 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl
What about the American bishops?

Hrmph!

In the United States, people are supposed to either abstain from meat or do some other form of penance.

How does that "some other form of penance" work?

American Catholics will pay about as much attention to abstaining from meat as they do current guidance.

8 posted on 03/18/2014 6:33:42 AM PDT by markomalley (Nothing emboldens the wicked so greatly as the lack of courage on the part of the good -- Leo XIII)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

It’s far from unnatural that something like this could and does happen when the head of the government and the head of the church are the same person. And, as I’m sure you’re aware, the Church’s prohibition is against meat, not pro-fish. The idea was to abstain from what constituted the high point in the daily diet. Once lobster thermidor, clams cassino, trout meuniere, etc., became available via refrigeration/electricity, abstaining from “meat” became less a sacrifice. Even so, it was as vivid a sign of Catholicism as ashes on the first Wednesday of Lent.

You may have heard the story, but I love the one about Perry Como who complained that the dinners to which he was invited invariably fell on Fridays. His stock line was, “I’ll have a poached egg on toast, and please serve it HOT.” Even if it wasn’t always a great sacrifice, it was still an undeniable profession of faith.


9 posted on 03/18/2014 6:36:04 AM PDT by Mach9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Apparently the Bible doesn’t matter. Penance isn’t biblical in the first place. A man’s standing before God is found wholly in Christ, not in rule-keeping and moralism. Christ Himself said, “unless your righteousness EXCEEDS that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.” (Emphasis mine)

Christ fulfilled the law and set believers free. True born again Christians are firmly fixed and complete in Christ. Their standing before God doesn’t waver because they are in Him.

“For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily. And ye are complete in him, which is the head of all principality and power:” (Colossians 2:9-10)

“Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days: Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ.” (Ephesians 2: 16-17)

“Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.” (Matthew 11:28)

“For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light.” (Matthew 11:30)


10 posted on 03/18/2014 6:36:04 AM PDT by .45 Long Colt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LibFreeUSA

You got that right!


11 posted on 03/18/2014 6:36:39 AM PDT by Biggirl (“Go, do not be afraid, and serve”-Pope Francis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

I’m with the Australian Bishops. Do year round abstinence right now.


12 posted on 03/18/2014 6:51:25 AM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibFreeUSA

If you are driven away by the prospect of foregoing meat one day a week, that says a lot about you, not the Church.


13 posted on 03/18/2014 7:16:28 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave

I could never figure out how a shrimp Po’Boy or a fried catfish platter could be considered penance. I’ll bet Mike Andersons is packed this Friday.


14 posted on 03/18/2014 7:57:18 AM PDT by sportutegrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

I wish they would do that in the States. I love fish.


15 posted on 03/18/2014 8:29:17 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Obamacare: You can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .45 Long Colt
Penance isn’t biblical in the first place.

Do a word search on "fasting," please. Then read Paul's comments on penance in 2 Cor in the original Greek.

16 posted on 03/18/2014 10:23:42 AM PDT by Campion ("Social justice" begins in the womb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
Where in the Bible does it say not to eat meat on Fridays?

Fish on Fridays for Catholics is in the chapter immediately after the chapter commanding Wednesday night Bible study for Protestants.

17 posted on 03/18/2014 10:25:21 AM PDT by Campion ("Social justice" begins in the womb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Campion; .45 Long Colt

You deeply misunderstand ‘fasting’ if you think it is in any way related to repentance.
.


18 posted on 03/18/2014 10:25:49 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Campion

LOLOL!


19 posted on 03/18/2014 10:26:47 AM PDT by who knows what evil? (Yehovah saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Campion; Mr. K

You should have directed Mr. K to the Dagon worship section in the ‘illuminated’ catechism.
.


20 posted on 03/18/2014 10:28:13 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave; LibFreeUSA

>> “If you are driven away by the prospect of foregoing meat one day a week, that says a lot about you, not the Church.” <<

.
Scripturally, we are to forego only that which is ‘unclean.’

To do otherwise is to add to scripture, which is forbidden.
.


21 posted on 03/18/2014 10:32:22 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

I’ve not eaten meat on Friday but a couple of times in my life. We always had fried fish on Fridays. It was a tradition in my family. When I became Catholic I told the RCIA class that it would not be hard for me to just eat fish on Fridays because I had already been doing it basically all my life. Not long before she died I asked my mother why she always cooked fish on Fridays and she because she liked fish! She goes on to say that fish was about the only food that anyone in the Bible ate so that was another good reason to eat fish. Fried fish, mostly catfish or flounder, hushpuppies and cole slaw, and of course with a big pitcher of ice tea to wash it all down with. Mama always had to have coffee with her fish. The only time she would drink coffee in the afternoon is when she ate fish. Breakfast sometimes was catfish and grits.


22 posted on 03/18/2014 12:06:00 PM PDT by NKP_Vet ("To be deep in history is to cease being Protestant" - John Henry Cardinal Newman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor; Campion

Indeed. I believe in fasting and I certainly believe in repentance. What I don’t believe in is penance. Men can’t atone for their sin themselves. Man’s best is still sinful (see Isaiah 64:6) so we would have to atone for our sinful penance. CHRIST bore the sins of His people on the cross. He paid the price! It is all about HIM!

“For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.”
— 2 Corinthians 5:21

“But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.”
—Isaiah 53:5


23 posted on 03/18/2014 12:49:55 PM PDT by .45 Long Colt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Thank you Jesus (and bible gateway)

Matthew 15

New International Version (NIV)

That Which Defiles

15 Then some Pharisees and teachers of the law came to Jesus from Jerusalem and asked, 2 “Why do your disciples break the tradition of the elders? They don’t wash their hands before they eat!”

3 Jesus replied, “And why do you break the command of God for the sake of your tradition? 4 For God said, ‘Honor your father and mother’[a] and ‘Anyone who curses their father or mother is to be put to death.’[b] 5 But you say that if anyone declares that what might have been used to help their father or mother is ‘devoted to God,’ 6 they are not to ‘honor their father or mother’ with it. Thus you nullify the word of God for the sake of your tradition. 7 You hypocrites! Isaiah was right when he prophesied about you:

8
“‘These people honor me with their lips,
but their hearts are far from me.

9
They worship me in vain;
their teachings are merely human rules.’[c]”

10 Jesus called the crowd to him and said, “Listen and understand. 11 What goes into someone’s mouth does not defile them, but what comes out of their mouth, that is what defiles them.”

12 Then the disciples came to him and asked, “Do you know that the Pharisees were offended when they heard this?”

13 He replied, “Every plant that my heavenly Father has not planted will be pulled up by the roots. 14 Leave them; they are blind guides.[d] If the blind lead the blind, both will fall into a pit.”

15 Peter said, “Explain the parable to us.”

16 “Are you still so dull?” Jesus asked them. 17 “Don’t you see that whatever enters the mouth goes into the stomach and then out of the body? 18 But the things that come out of a person’s mouth come from the heart, and these defile them. 19 For out of the heart come evil thoughts—murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false testimony, slander. 20 These are what defile a person; but eating with unwashed hands does not defile them.”


24 posted on 03/18/2014 1:05:50 PM PDT by right way right (America has embraced the suck of Freedumb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K; Tax-chick; GregB; Berlin_Freeper; SumProVita; narses; bboop; SevenofNine; Ronaldus Magnus; ..
Where in the Bible does it say not to eat meat on Fridays?

Dear friend, have you ever sacrificed something you wanted in order to demonstrate your love for someone else? That is the concept behind a Friday abstinence. It is a personal discipline, that rises from the heart, out of love for the One who gave His life for us, on a Friday.

At one time, the church mandated this form of abstinence for precisely that purpose. Midway through the 20th century, the Catholic church, acknowledging that some catholics, due to societal constraints, found themselves in situations where such a sacrifice was no longer possible, proffered the notion of substituting another form of personal sacrifice on Fridays. Sadly, most Catholics heard "okay to eat meat on Fridays" but not the part that followed.

Abstinence should come from the heart. I choose to abstain on Fridays, for that very reason, not because it is mandated or in the Bible. In so doing, it becomes a personal journey with our Lord that draws us closer together. Given the increasing number of Americans who consider themselves "vegetarians", mandating a meatless Friday has no effect on them.

What could you sacrifice for one day each week, as an act of love for Jesus Christ?

25 posted on 03/18/2014 4:15:06 PM PDT by NYer ("You are a puff of smoke that appears briefly and then disappears." James 4:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Well said!


26 posted on 03/18/2014 5:08:18 PM PDT by al_c (Obama's standing in the world has fallen so much that Kenya now claims he was born in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: NYer

wrong... research your history

The catholic church made a deal with local fishermen to get people to eat more fish

I am not going to sacrifice meat eating for the church to make a buck


27 posted on 03/18/2014 6:21:54 PM PDT by Mr. K (If you like your constitution, you can keep it...Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
Where in the Bible does it say not to eat meat on Fridays?

it doesn't, however the church has Christs' authority to make its' own institutional rules. If you want to be a Catholic, there are rules to follow. This was a pretty easy penance to engage in, and it reminded you, every week, that a little penance went a long way. The Bible does, however, say that we should keep holy the lord's day....do you attend church services EVERY week?

28 posted on 03/18/2014 7:58:50 PM PDT by terycarl (common sense prevails over all else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
wrong... research your history The catholic church made a deal with local fishermen to get people to eat more fish I am not going to sacrifice meat eating for the church to make a buck

wrong....interpret history correctly....under your scenario, the church made no money, the fishermen did.....

29 posted on 03/18/2014 8:10:10 PM PDT by terycarl (common sense prevails over all else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Mach9

I noticed even in Iraq at the bigger FOBs lobster and steak were served on Friday’s. So the Ol’ padre could have his “fish.”:)


30 posted on 03/18/2014 8:46:29 PM PDT by redleghunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

If you’re going to research history, you must follow it through to the end. For much of Christian history, flesh meat was a delicacy for landowners and out of reach for most of the population. Fish was the one protein the poor could add to their primarily porridge based diet without spending a lot of money or endangering themselves by poaching.

The meals of the wealthy, conversely, consisted of course after course of cattle and game. In essence, you’re complaining that the church forced the rich to eat like poor people once a week.


31 posted on 03/19/2014 4:01:55 AM PDT by Eepsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

I don’t expect much from the American bishops, after all they gave us the NAB translation whose copyright they own.

We also had the worst translation of the mass which was finally re-done a few years ago. (I believe 2011)

That was the gift of the American bishops as well. Hopefully the generation coming up will re-do the actions of the former generation of bishops in America.


32 posted on 03/19/2014 6:36:57 AM PDT by Not gonna take it anymore (If Obama were twice as smart as he is, he would be a wit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Which Bible do you use?


33 posted on 03/19/2014 6:39:44 AM PDT by Not gonna take it anymore (If Obama were twice as smart as he is, he would be a wit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Not gonna take it anymore

For general use, the KJV.

It is the most reliable of the English whole Bibles.

I also use many related aids and completely Biblical teachings. I reject all that requires sorting or selecting portions out of scripture.

Any theory that leaves portions of the word as untrue, or not to be followed is most likely false at its foundation.


34 posted on 03/19/2014 10:29:29 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Not gonna take it anymore

>> “I don’t expect much from the American bishops, after all they gave us the NAB translation whose copyright they own.” <<

.
That which is copyrighted is strictly for profit, not for truth, or reading.
.


35 posted on 03/19/2014 10:31:44 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
Completely wrong. I read medieval history as an undergraduate, long before I was Catholic (although reading folks like St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas will push you in that direction.)

For most of the first thousand years or so of Western (Christian) Europe, meat - mutton, beef, poultry, and especially venison - was a delicacy that only the rich could afford, and fish was the food of the poor.

So much so that the London apprentices petitioned their masters' guilds that they only be forced to eat salmon twice a week.

You can't believe everything you read around the internet.

36 posted on 03/19/2014 3:40:10 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ecce Crucem Domini, fugite partes adversae. Vicit Leo de Tribu Iuda, Radix David, Alleluia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Not gonna take it anymore
I personally would be happy to contribute to an auto-da-fe at which every available copy of the NAB was consigned to the flames. It's not only a bad translation in the sense that it's inaccurate; it's also clunky-sounding and already badly dated because of its use of transitory 'modern' expressions.

The Douay-Rheims (Challoner revision) is pretty good but rather Latinate-sounding (no surprise there). It was heavily relied on in the KJV New Testament. The RSV (Catholic edition) isn't bad either. I was raised on KJV, but it has its drawbacks, among them inaccurate translation and scholarship that has been superseded. Its language, however, is without peer save for the Douay. The 17th century scholarly Englishman spoke and wrote the purest and most graceful English the world has ever seen -- whether he was in OxBridge, Westminster, or Douay.

My personal fave at the moment is the Knox Bible by the immensely scholarly and talented Msgr. Ronald Knox (he also wrote detective stories; pretty good ones). It is everything a 'dynamic translation' should be - unlike the poor excuse for same exemplified in the NAB and the "old, lame duck" Mass translation.

37 posted on 03/19/2014 3:47:05 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ecce Crucem Domini, fugite partes adversae. Vicit Leo de Tribu Iuda, Radix David, Alleluia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Eepsy
I must read the whole thread before commenting.

I must read the whole thread before commenting.

I must read the whole thread before commenting.

I must read the whole thread before commenting.

I must read the whole thread before commenting.

38 posted on 03/19/2014 3:50:19 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ecce Crucem Domini, fugite partes adversae. Vicit Leo de Tribu Iuda, Radix David, Alleluia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
That which is copyrighted is strictly for profit, not for truth, or reading.

I don't know if I'd go so far as to say that in every case, because 'the laborer is worthy of his hire', but it certainly is a strong temptation.

We see it not only in the NAB (and the bishops' insistence that that be the only version used at Mass) but also in the music publishers like OCP and GIA . . . they would rather print copyrighted music by their own questionable modern "composers" than decent Catholic music that's public domain or under someone else's copyright.

But there's a new movement afoot in the Church to distribute music more freely. I hope it takes off.

39 posted on 03/19/2014 3:53:58 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ecce Crucem Domini, fugite partes adversae. Vicit Leo de Tribu Iuda, Radix David, Alleluia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

From your earlier reply:

“To do otherwise is to add to scripture, which is forbidden.”

If you are using the current KJV you are missing seven books. So you may not have added to scripture but you have subtracted.


40 posted on 03/20/2014 6:16:09 AM PDT by Not gonna take it anymore (If Obama were twice as smart as he is, he would be a wit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Not gonna take it anymore

I have no idea what you are talking about.

Do you?
.


41 posted on 03/20/2014 11:53:08 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson