Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/07/2014 2:46:26 PM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Tax-chick; GregB; Berlin_Freeper; SumProVita; narses; bboop; SevenofNine; Ronaldus Magnus; tiki; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 06/07/2014 2:46:43 PM PDT by NYer ("You are a puff of smoke that appears briefly and then disappears." James 4:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

Treasonous, self-serving EXEMPT Congress has shown
how to ABDICATE. They have let American security,
economy, and Law be destroyed in under 6 years.


3 posted on 06/07/2014 2:49:21 PM PDT by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
It's time for states to NULLIFY UNCONSTITUTIONAL FEDERAL COURT DECISIONS.

Nullify Judge Barbara Crabb's unconstitutional and odious decision. We must assert that we are not a country ruled by man (or woman) but ruled by law, the Supreme Law of the Land, the Constitution.

4 posted on 06/07/2014 2:50:49 PM PDT by PapaNew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

Gay marriage wasn’t allowed before the amendment, so it’s still not legal... right?

heh


5 posted on 06/07/2014 2:56:31 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

Poll to freep

http://www.jsonline.com/polls/262164541.html?results=y&mr=1&oid=2&pid=262164541&cid=8500544


7 posted on 06/07/2014 2:59:41 PM PDT by UB355 (Slower traffic keep right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

As soon as marriage is defined as a union between anything and any number of other things, it will simply be a legal contract much the same as any business contract. In other words, a civil contract. Marriage will not mean anything in this context.

Marriage can then be defined as biblical Holy Matrimony, to be performed within a church and apart from any civil action. The married man and woman can then do the civil paperwork for the civil stuff.


8 posted on 06/07/2014 3:02:09 PM PDT by NewHampshireDuo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

I’m puzzled. I know judges are out of control, but how can an article of a State Constitution be struck down as UNconstitutional? Isn’t it constitutional by definition?

Or is it an assertion of unbridled Federal judicial supremacy?


9 posted on 06/07/2014 3:12:19 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

Read reviews for this judge. These reviews were given prior to this decision. They are very unfavorable.


10 posted on 06/07/2014 3:21:33 PM PDT by lastchance ("Nisi credideritis, non intelligetis" St. Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
Homosexuals should not be allowed to adopt. And I bet they want to. That will be the next step in their hell-bent efforts to "normalize" what CANNOT be normalized.

They can "adopt" unwanted dogs and cats! Now THAT would be a blessing to all!

11 posted on 06/07/2014 3:32:59 PM PDT by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

“Yesterday was a very bad day for Wisconsin.”

Wisconsin has a bad case of the Crabbs!


12 posted on 06/07/2014 3:39:25 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
C'mon Walker. Tell this judge to pound sand and that WI will thumb their nose at the ruling until SCOTUS can clear the air. Arrest county clerks who issue homosexual "marriage" licenses.
14 posted on 06/07/2014 5:14:59 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson