Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/13/2014 5:46:16 PM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Brian Kopp DPM

It may be Muslim’s one and only chance to give the Vatican over to themselves, why wouldn’t he pray the prayer that gives them that?


2 posted on 06/13/2014 5:48:15 PM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian Kopp DPM

The bigger problem is that he was hosting a joint prayer with infidels in the first place, which is absolutely condemned by scripture. The Muzzie asking God to help him beat the guys next to him is just the icing on the cake.


3 posted on 06/13/2014 5:49:30 PM PDT by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Council of Vienna on Muslims

07/06/14 12:19
namaaz_muslims_prayer_mosque
From the Council of Vienne, under Pope Clement V: Canon [25]:

"It is an insult to the holy name and a disgrace to the Christian faith that in certain parts of the world subject to Christian princes where Saracens live, sometimes apart, sometimes intermingled with Christians, the Saracen priests commonly called Zabazala, in their temples or mosques, in which the Saracens meet to adore the infidel Mahomet, loudly invoke and extol his name each day at certain hours from a high place, in the hearing of both Christians and Saracens and there make public declarations in his honour. There is a place, moreover, where once was buried a certain Saracen whom other Saracens venerate as a saint. A great number of Saracens flock there quite openly from far and near. This brings disrepute on our faith and gives great scandal to the faithful. These practices cannot be tolerated any further without displeasing the divine majesty. We therefore, with the sacred council's approval, strictly forbid such practices henceforth in Christian lands. We enjoin on catholic princes, one and all, who hold sovereignty over the said Saracens and in whose territory these practices occur, and we lay on them a pressing obligation under the divine judgment that, as true Catholics and zealous for the Christian faith, they give consideration to the disgrace heaped on both them and other Christians. They are to remove this offence altogether from their territories and take care that their subjects remove it, so that they may thereby attain the reward of eternal happiness. They are to forbid expressly the public invocation of the sacrilegious name of Mahomet. They shall also forbid anyone in their dominions to attempt in future the said pilgrimage or in any way give countenance to it. Those who presume to act otherwise are to be so chastised by the princes for their irreverence, that others may be deterred from such boldness."
- Source: http://www.ewtn.com/library/councils/vienne.htm

4 posted on 06/13/2014 5:50:06 PM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Who Edited the Tape?

Posted on June 13, 2014 by

That’s what everyone wanted to know about the notorious 18½-minute gap in Richard Nixon’s Watergate tape, for which Rosemary Woods eventually took the fall.

Now it appears that something similar happened with the Vatican’s tape of the interfaith prayers-for-peace from last Sunday, giving us even more reason to dub this controversy “Imamgate”.

As we reported in last night’s post about the imam’s prayer at the Vatican, there seems to be nothing controversial in the chanted Arabic in the prayer and that spoken in his subsequent remarks. However, a reader and commenter named ritamalik — who is a former Muslim and understands Arabic — tells us that a portion of the video has been edited out, and the omitted section included the verse asking Allah to grant victory over the infidels.

The explanation below is adapted from two separate comments by ritamalik on last night’s post:

You were accurate! Don’t blame yourself! These bastards have cut out the controversial last half-verse from imam’s recitation in the clip. What they have done here is pure and simple censorship, deception and rewriting of history. Pay attention to the clip. They cut his recitation in the middle of the last verse!

I do understand Quranic Arabic very well. I also know Quran itself rather well. I am an ex-Muslim. This link that you have posted was cut! The full recitation from the Quran by this imam that I watched on the Al Arabiya channel two days ago had his recitation up until the final verses, and without a shadow of a doubt he recited the second sura Al Bagharah’s last few verses till the very end where he did say, “and pardon us and forgive us and have mercy on us, you are our guardian, so make us victorious over the tribe of disbelievers [or ‘deniers’, as the word kafir really means]”.

Now the question is: who chopped this video to take out the controversial part out of it? It is cut literally in the middle of the verse where the controversial part starts, and jumps to the imam’s prayer in his own words, which are not controversial. You can recognize the end of recitation and beginning of his own prayer by the fact that he stopped singing and start speaking normally. If you pay attention you will notice the place where it was cut. It is noticeable.

They kept his recitation until the end of the of “forgive us and have mercy on us.” But the last two clauses — “you are our guardian, so grant us victory over unbelievers” was neatly and in very Stalinesque fashion airbrushed out! Cunning bastards!


That is why your Russian translator didn’t hear anything controversial. But he can go check his Quran and see that up till the last two clauses which are missing, everything before it is the final verses of sura 2. Now you want to tell me he just left out the last half verse from his recitation?! Of course not! Who recites Quran while reciting a verse only half way through?!

They are counting on people’s ignorance of Arabic and Quranic content. They want to throw us off track and confuse us. Your original report was 100% correct! You have nothing to correct. Only now you can also report that these bastards have censored the original footage to save themselves from the embarrassment of being mocked and outwitted by an imam. That’s all! Don’t fall for it.

And the fact that they had to censor the original footage shows that despite their original denials they recognized the damage and the legitimacy of those reports which pointed it out!

The big question is: Who edited the tape?

It had to have been done by someone in the Vatican, or by someone employed by the Vatican. So the Imamgate scandal has just become even more scandalous.

To recap:

1.   The Pope invited an imam to the Vatican to say prayers at an interfaith event.
2.   Departing from a pre-released script, the imam prayed in Arabic for Allah to grant victory over the unbelievers.
3.   The Vatican denied that the imam said anything of that nature.
4.   The Vatican altered a video of the event to remove any evidence of the damning clause.
 

So what comes next? What will #5 be? Stay tuned.

Also: if anyone can find an uncut version of the Arabic part of the video, please send us the URL.

Previous posts about Imamgate — The Arabic prayer at the Vatican, June 8 2014:

2014   Jun   11   The Vatican and Islamic Prayer
        12   Taqiyya, Vatican-Style
        12   What Did the Imam Really Say at the Vatican?

6 posted on 06/13/2014 5:54:36 PM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian Kopp DPM

Interesting!


8 posted on 06/13/2014 5:55:59 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian Kopp DPM

Thank you, Brian, for bringing this to our attention.

If there is any Catholic over the age of twelve who believes that a Pope and an Imam can be chummy, without dire consequences, I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell him.

Why do these people think we fought the Crusades?


15 posted on 06/13/2014 6:09:35 PM PDT by miserare (2014--The Year We Fight Back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian Kopp DPM

This is just frightening.

What do you make of this?


16 posted on 06/13/2014 7:16:42 PM PDT by Bigg Red (31 May 2014: Obamugabe officially declares the USA a vanquished subject of the Global Caliphate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian Kopp DPM
Did the Christian representatives have anything in their prayers along the lines of, "Open the eyes of the world, dear Lord, so they may see your salvation through faith in Jesus Christ.", or were they generic, ecumenical types?

The iman's prayer, itself, I'm not worried about because there IS no Allah and Islam is a false religion, but it would be worrisome if he actually showed more boldness in proclaiming his faith than the Christians did - in the Vatican.

19 posted on 06/13/2014 8:32:11 PM PDT by boatbums (Proud member of the Free Republic Bible Thumpers Brigade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian Kopp DPM; Gamecock
IB4TPIWMA
21 posted on 06/13/2014 8:59:59 PM PDT by Alex Murphy ("the defacto Leader of the FR Calvinist Protestant Brigades")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson