Unless the peasant is a poor rural American Protestant who believes Genesis 1-11 is actual history. Then he's an idiot . . . right?[/sarc]
How about, . . . a poor rural American Protestant who believes . . . in Jesus Christ as their Savior?
Christ was present at the Creation as part of the Holy Trinity, that point is more fundamental than Genesis 1:11 so if we're changing this to a thread about the Creation, let's start with God as the Holy Trinity of which Christ is a part and go from there instead of playing the same old game of spreading division with BS and lies about what others believe.
The spread division crowd don't want to focus on their own beliefs which assert that by definition anyone who believes in Christ as their Savior is already well beyond being an idiot.
For example, to what extent does this article focus on the Creation? To what extent does it discuss the book of Genesis? To what extent does it focus on differences between what Christians in Iraq believe about the Creation as compared to what US Evangelicals believe about the Creation?
Show of hands,
Who believes that Jesus Christ as part of the Holy Trinity was integral to the Creation of all things as described in Genesis 1?
Who denies that fundamental point about our Savior Jesus Christ?
People who consider all Christians to be idiots anyway (or at the very least misled suckers following a con man, liar, and agent of Satan) can't possibly be concerned with anything other than spreading divisions among Christians when they comment on an article about Eastern Christians and Evangelicals.
Naturally, Jesus did sometimes pretend to respect the Law, but whenever he thought he could get away with it, he turned right around and broke that same Law. In Matthew 5:17-19, he declared that he came to fulfill the Law, and in Matthew 23:1-3 he defended the authority of the rabbis. But the rest of the time, he rebelled against the Law—thus showing that his occasional words of piety were meant only to hide his evil agenda.
and this at the same link in the same description of Jesus Christ :
The Talmud (Babylonian edition) records other sins of "Jesus the Nazarene":
He and his disciples practiced sorcery and black magic, led Jews astray into idolatry, and were sponsored by foreign, gentile powers for the purpose of subverting Jewish worship (Sanhedrin 43a).
He was sexually immoral, worshipped statues of stone (a brick is mentioned), was cut off from the Jewish people for his wickedness, and refused to repent (Sanhedrin 107b; Sotah 47a).
He learned witchcraft in Egypt and, to perform miracles, used procedures that involved cutting his flesh—which is also explicitly banned in the Bible (Shabbos 104b).
When someone who insists that Christ had an evil agenda and denies Jesus Christ is God from God, our Savior, their BS comments about Christians are worse than garbage. They're puss flowing from their own hatred of Jesus Christ and their desire to see Christians divided rather than standing together to spread the Truth of Christ as our Savior as Christians are commanded to do.
That should be obvious from the fact that such folks reject everything in the New Testament(1).
(1)From the Noahide site :Thus the "New Testament" was written, in Greek rather than Hebrew, and attached to the original Hebrew scriptures to try to change their meaning back toward paganism.