Did you see how the vote came down in the original post. I don’t understand you saying that all of them agreed.
My opinion is that- there is a group meeting held, to decide who will be “for and against.” The product is delivered to stir most of US to emotionalism, beyond any sense of reasonable acuity. Thus the bs continues, without any real interference, by US. If you take a good survey of this courts decisions, for the last 70 years, you will find a surprise. And the beat goes on...