Interesting illustration. Gets the point across quite well.
But why the outrage?
Loose gals lose the stickiness?
Dam.
Thanks for the heads up.. Maybe next time.
Wow who knew girls lose their “stickiness”.
If you pour a little honey on them before....nevermind.
Parents outraged because they want their kids to be easy?
I don’t buy it.
The tape analogy is a good one.
When tape loses its stickiness, you throw it away.
How did I miss out on this???
There are legitimate reasons both moral and healthwise for people not to have multiple sex partners, losing stickiness is not one of them. It may not be possible to discuss those reasons in an age appropriate manner with twelve year olds.
It may be true that women will be judged for what they wear but making a foolish choice does not mean a criminal is not responsible for his or her own behavior. Nothing wrong with explaining why certain modes of dress are not suitable in some situations or for some ages. To imply males are not responsible for self control is not.
Most of all though it should not be the place of schools to impose values on children that are contrary to that of the parents unless such values are criminal or would cause great immediate harm to the child. For me that means schools should stay out of sex ed completely except for the basic biology. The moral implications of sexual behavior is for the parents to teach their children.
Kids are exposed to 1000 acts of sex and licentiousness every day on TV, internet, and every else in society - and people protest when they are given one small voice of the opposite?