Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/08/2016 8:06:08 AM PST by D Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: D Rider

The supposition that monkeys typing away at keyboards would inevitably result in coherent speech is patently false. Given even an eternity of years, those monkeys would not be able to muster even the most rudimentary level of human speech.


2 posted on 11/08/2016 8:22:07 AM PST by tjd1454
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: D Rider

The supposition that monkeys typing away at keyboards would inevitably result in coherent speech is patently false. Given even an eternity of years, those monkeys would not be able to muster even the most rudimentary level of human speech.


3 posted on 11/08/2016 8:22:12 AM PST by tjd1454
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: D Rider

“In essence it is the observation that the universe appears to be fine tuned for human life, and relatively small changes in physical constants would make life impossible.”

This is a logical fallacy from a self centered viewpoint. It looks at everything around and decides it was all finely tuned to support the exact needs our physiology has.
The opposite is just as logical. A creature of our physiology could not possibly evolve in ANY other environment but this one, so this is the only place where you ever COULD find us.

The problem in the whole article is where is says you no longer “need faith to see a creator”. That is exactly and precisely what is needed. Efforts to prove god with science are a fools errand. You might as well try to search for heaven with the Hubble Telescope.

Just follow faith, live faith, and spread your faith to unbelievers. But using science to bring people to God is an error, because it everything in science is well explainable without God. Our argument is simple enough already, that our faith tells us god made such amazing and complex things.


6 posted on 11/08/2016 8:45:12 AM PST by DesertRhino (November 8, America's Brexit!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: D Rider

It has been said that Shakespeare didn’t write those plays, so how do we know that the monkeys didn’t write them in the first place?


8 posted on 11/08/2016 9:06:41 AM PST by longfellow (Bill Maher, the 21st hijacker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: D Rider

“Being outside all perception, there is no chance of proving or directly disproving the possibility of the multiverse.”

That’s really the only argument you need. It is a hypothesis that science can never test, therefore it is outside the bounds of naturalistic science. It may be theology, or philosophy, but “multiverse theory” is definitely not science.


13 posted on 11/08/2016 10:33:36 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson