It is very interesting that the source that you quote says that the new Code or Canon Law was based on the Council. Redoing the Canon Law is at least a twenty year process. And you want a person, who never even attended the Council to take responsibility, even though he did not attend, and was all but sequestered in a communist country, just because he got elected Pope in 1978, the Council having ended in 1964, and twenty four years later, you want a Pope who could not possibly have had an affect on its writing as a newly elected Pope, he was even shot in 1981, you want to lay it on his door step and make him totally responsible for it three papacies later! It seems as though you have already assigned blame and by the amount of time between when I posted this and your answer, there was not enough time for you to check out even one of my references. You have nothing but bad things to say about the people in Rome but you swallow every lie they want to tell you. If that’s your idea of consistency, I’ll go to my judgement and defend my own idea of consistency. You’re stuck with them by your own choice. I am not.
The source was JPII’s very own official Apostolic Constitution Sacrae disciplinae leges. I’m sure you will offer up some “source” to deny this as well.
I am a Traditional Catholic who lays responsibility on any and all hierarchs that promote the non-Catholic Vatican II Religion and, contrary to what you say, I rarely if ever believe a word Rome says. You just need to follow my posts for awhile to see that.
So, yeah, I am VERY consistent. JPII or any other post Vatican II pope who went along with the robber council are equally responsible. Any Catholic pope would have stopped the madness long ago.
By the way, Wojtyla did in fact attend the Second Vatican Council; he was a Council Father at all four sessions in fact:
http://www.catholic-hierarchy.org/bishop/bwojtyla.html