You realize that the chart does not establish KJV superiority. It simply demonstrates that translators are reliant on two different piles of source texts.
See James White’s The King James Controversy.
Can’t trust James White, he’s an enemy of the truth.
“James White states, You should never have to wonder if you are going to be accepted by others if you use an NIV rather than a KJV (or vice versa!). Fellowship should never be base upon the English translation one carries and studies.[4] Is White correct?
The startling news that NIV will become a unisex version was published in the March 29, 1997 edition of World Magazine. This change of the gender of God is not based on an accurate translation of the original Greek manuscripts.
Rather it is a theological change, a complete capitulation to feminism and the mother goddess worship of witchcraft and Mariolatry. Should we not break fellowship with those who call this latest NIV perversion of God’s gender (from he to he-she) the Bible?”
http://www.tulipgems.com/WhichBible5.htm