Skip to comments.
[Catholic Caucus] LATEST ON SHROUD OF TURIN: Science Finally Catches Up with Faith
The Remnant Newspaper ^
| April 5, 2019
| G. Maresca
Posted on 04/06/2019 5:34:24 PM PDT by ebb tide
LATEST ON SHROUD OF TURIN: Science Finally Catches Up with Faith
It is the most intriguing and unique relic of its kind and the longstanding irony is there are legions of professed Christians who have no idea what it is, or that it even exists.
The Shroud of Turin is revered as the sacred burial cloth of Jesus Christ and is arguably the most important archaeological artifact ever found.
The image on the cloth is like a photographic negative exposed to light that is a detailed portrait of a crucified man. The historical specifics include the multitude of gashes from the scourging, the flow of blood, the presence of Pontius Pilate coins on the eyes, the wounds on the wrists and not the hands, the presence of a pony-tail running down the mans back, bits of pollen that are unique to the region around Jerusalem are all remarkably accurate.
Some believe the shroud is the work of a talented medieval forger, but how could even the cleverest of medieval fakers have managed to get so many details right and to have produced, in photographic negative no less, an image that no artist of the time was even vaguely capable of creating?
For almost one millennium, countless Christians have venerated the shroud as the authentic burial garment of Jesus. The Catholic Church has never officially declared it to be the real burial shroud of Christ, although it does claim that this inexplicable icon is worthy of Christian devotion.
For centuries, the shroud has been kept in the Cathedral of St. John the Baptist in Turin, Italy. Throughout the years after thousands of hours of scientific analysis, the shrouds silent testimony of our Lords sufferings on the cross is finally being unraveled to the scientific community.
Shroud of Turin Image: Encoded 3-D Information at High Resolution
In 1988, the Church gave scientists permission to test a piece of the shroud using radiocarbon dating. The results showed dates ranging from 1260 to 1390 AD.
However, other experts believed those findings were skewed because only a corner of the shroud was tested and such a sample could have been part of a medieval repair, or that it was contaminated over time by human handling, bacteria or carbon monoxide.
More recently another team of researchers in mechanical and thermal measurement at Italys University of Padua conducted three tests on that same 1988 sample using infrared light and Raman spectroscopy relating to voltage. The results date the shroud between 300 BC and 400 AD, which is certainly during the time of Jesus.
Moreover, the Italian Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development conducted experiments over the last five years and reported that the total power of VUV radiations required to instantly color the surface of the linen that corresponds to a human of average height and body is equal to 34 thousand billion watts. Further, the image contains three-dimensional properties in the varying intensities of its shading.
Do you subscribe to the oldest tradtional Catholic Newspaper in the world?
Even with the marvels of all our 21st century technology, the image on the cloth cant be replicated. Why is something that is 2,000 years old, so unreproducible?
Despite what skeptics and critics insist, its authenticity remains scientifically plausible.
As with any miraculous religious artifact, the shroud is certainly subject to plenty of doubt. The image clearly seems to depict Jesus wrapped in linen after being scourged, crucified, stabbed in his side and made to wear a crown of thorns.
We live in a media saturated world where we communicate more with images than words. So why wouldnt God preserve His sons burial cloth for our time?
There is a Shroud 2.0 app that is free for iPad and iPhone users and provides a close-up view of the shroud that affords people to zoom in on various sections of the shroud that would otherwise not be possible and read Gospel passages related to it.
The image is physical proof of what happened during the crucifixion and resurrection. It is for humankind to appreciate, acknowledge and adore.
In an Easter paradox, it is science that is finally catching up to faith.
This new body of evidence favoring the faithful may not be enough to convince hardened cynics, which underscores the old adage that for those who believe, no explanation is necessary, and for those who dont believe no explanation is necessary.
TOPICS: Catholic
KEYWORDS: clothofturin; italy; medievalfake; medievalhoax; shroud; shroudofturin; tourism; travel; turin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
1
posted on
04/06/2019 5:34:24 PM PDT
by
ebb tide
To: Al Hitan; Biggirl; Coleus; DuncanWaring; ebb tide; Fedora; Hieronymus; irishjuggler; G Larry; ...
2
posted on
04/06/2019 5:35:13 PM PDT
by
ebb tide
("We have a rogue curia in Rome")
To: ebb tide
For those who believe, no poof is needed, for those who do not believe, no proof is enough.
3
posted on
04/06/2019 5:40:02 PM PDT
by
Rumplemeyer
(The GOP should stand its ground - and fix Bayonets)
To: Rumplemeyer
4
posted on
04/06/2019 5:45:46 PM PDT
by
coaster123
(Men: Standard American handshake. Women: Curtsy.)
To: ebb tide
I went to a three and a half day seminar on The Shroud. It convinced me it is real and not some Medieval fake.
Can I get on s list for updates on this?
5
posted on
04/06/2019 5:50:54 PM PDT
by
SkyDancer
( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
To: Rumplemeyer
An excellent and accurate point.
Luke 16:31 comes to mind.
6
posted on
04/06/2019 5:55:11 PM PDT
by
MrEdd
(Caveat Emptor)
To: ebb tide
John 10:14 I am the good shepherd: and I know mine, and mine know me. 15 As the Father knows me, and I know the Father: and I lay down my life for my sheep. 16 And other sheep I have that are not of this fold: them also I must bring. And they shall hear my voice: And there shall be one fold and one shepherd. 17 Therefore does the Father love me: because I lay down my life, that I may take it again. 18 No man takes it away from me: but I lay it down of myself. And I have power to lay it down: and I have power to take it up again. This commandment have I received of my Father.
Thanks for the thoughtful post, ebb tide.
7
posted on
04/06/2019 5:57:23 PM PDT
by
Montana_Sam
(Truth lives.)
To: ebb tide
Why is the Church not weighing in on the authenticity of the Shroud?
8
posted on
04/06/2019 5:58:59 PM PDT
by
Hostage
(Article V)
To: coaster123
Thats not true at all.
Prove its not true.
9
posted on
04/06/2019 6:00:39 PM PDT
by
The_Media_never_lie
("The media is the enemy of the American people." Democrat Pat Caddell)
To: ebb tide
In my mind. Evidence beyond any reasonable doubt - certainly. Thank you for the post
10
posted on
04/06/2019 6:04:09 PM PDT
by
atc23
To: Rumplemeyer
What a ridiculous statement.
12
posted on
04/06/2019 6:13:40 PM PDT
by
dinodino
To: Rumplemeyer
It’s possible to believe in Jesus without believing the Shroud is authentic. A former pastor of mine thought that Jesus didn’t look like that (Judas had to kiss him in order for the Romans to know who he was).
34 thousand billion watts? You would think the cloth would catch fire, no?
To: scrabblehack
To: ebb tide
In the church called ‘Santa Croce in Gerusalemme’ in Rome, there is a side room. In that room there is a computerized, full-size exact replica of the entire Shroud. You can peruse all of it from 3 feet away.
Studying it just in that way was a staggering experience.
15
posted on
04/06/2019 6:38:50 PM PDT
by
SaxxonWoods
(The internet has driven the world mad.)
To: ebb tide
In the church called ‘Santa Croce in Gerusalemme’ in Rome, there is a side room. In that room there is a computerized, full-size exact replica of the entire Shroud. You can peruse all of it from 3 feet away.
Studying it just in that way was a staggering experience.
16
posted on
04/06/2019 6:38:50 PM PDT
by
SaxxonWoods
(The internet has driven the world mad.)
To: Rumplemeyer
Not to nitpick, but that does not agree with scripture. Thomas disbelieved until he actually touched the wounds on the body of the risen Christ. Only then did he believe completely.
17
posted on
04/06/2019 6:49:18 PM PDT
by
Kirkwood
(Zombie Hunter)
To: ebb tide
The question I have about the shroud is that it appears to be a 2-D image rather than a 3-D image that would happen if it was actually wrapped around a body. The proportions look like what would be represented in a photo or painting or other flat object. So why aren’t the features significantly wider in proportion to the height, to account for the curvature of the body?
A small test we can all perform: Run a piece of string from one ear across the face to the other ear and mark it. Then put the string horizontally on a mirror and stand back and look at your own head in proportion to the length of the string. the string will be wider than the distance between your ears as viewed in the mirror.
Caveat - I’m not a scientist and I know there are a whole lot of FReepers smarter than I am, so if there’s a reason for proportions of the face on the shroud looking 2-dimensional, I’d be interested in learning about it.
18
posted on
04/06/2019 6:53:29 PM PDT
by
Two Kids' Dad
(((( Wake me when a prominent democrat gets prosecuted. ))))
To: Two Kids' Dad
Miracles contain their own inner logic.
19
posted on
04/06/2019 7:12:43 PM PDT
by
Louis Foxwell
(The denial of the authority of God is the central plank of the Progressive movement.)
To: ebb tide
20
posted on
04/06/2019 7:33:43 PM PDT
by
preacher
( Journalism no longer reports news, they use news to shape our society.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson