Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Brilliant

This is meant to go all the way to the Supreme Court, and re-visit Roe v. Wade, this time with a look at what really IS at stake. We have some forty-five years of perspective relating to the cumulative impact of “abortion on demand” that was NEVER voted on by any state legislature, or approved by the voting public. It was simply imposed by judicial fiat.

Laws passed by one state should not be compelled upon another state which may have a culture somewhat at variance with the first.


19 posted on 05/15/2019 7:35:35 PM PDT by alloysteel (The difference between real life and fiction? Fiction has to make sense and follow some logic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: alloysteel

Yes but all it does is shift the fight to the states and I suspect the prolifers will find it difficult to sustain a complete ban, which is what Alabama is doing.


26 posted on 05/15/2019 7:45:19 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: alloysteel

Agree. Someone will challenge it. It will end up in the supreme court. Roe vs wade could very well be reversed. The case that got it passed was weak and they know it.


29 posted on 05/15/2019 7:51:24 PM PDT by virgil (The evil that men do lives after them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson