Why post this?
RE: Why post this?
So readers can refute the author. WITH REASON and EVIDENCE.
Since I have not read your response ( and do not know whether it is forthcoming ), I thought I’d like to post my response to the author.
He said: “If Trump is a malignant narcissist as many of us believe, he is an evil person and has no redeeming qualities.”
Even if he exagerrated statement above is true ( which it is not ), I’d like to ask him — WHAT IS OUR ALTERNATIVE in 2016?
Should we vote for the opponent who:
1) Threatened and intimidated the woman who her husband raped?
2) Used her party’s money to fabricate a fake dossier on her opponent so that the country would be plunged into 2 wasted years and millions of dollars in an investigation that went nowhere? ( What is that commandment about not bearing false witness again, Mr. Thurman?)
3) Refuses to answer for abandoning our soldiers when they needed help in Benghazi and then lying about the cause of the attack to their families?
4) Endanger the national security of our country by putting Sensitive National information on a private server in order to hide her dealings to enrich herself, her husband and their foundation?
5) Concoct a lie to justify the firing of an innocent man named Billy Dale, in Travelgate, who was bankrupted trying to defend himself only to be acquitted later?
6) Supports the killing of babies up to the time of birth? (Trump has shown that he is one of the MOST PRO-LIFE Presidents this country has ever seen ).
7) Supports the appointment of judges and justices who will refuse to protect our religious freedoms? (Trump is doing the OPPOSITE of what Hillary planned to do ).
8) Said she supported traditional marriage, only to change her mind and now strongly support the redefinition of marriage?
IS THAT WHO EVANGELICALS SHOULD SUPPORT MR. THURMAN?
AND SUPPORTING A WOMAN WHO DOES ALL THE ABOVE IS NOT SUPPORTING EVIL?
What this writer does not get is this — we are not given black and white choices in elections but a choice between flawed individuals.
Evangelicals are BETTER OFF choosing the flawed person who supports the causes Evangelical care about.
If Thurman prefers Evangelicals to support Hillary, he better give us his reasons as to why he thinks it is the better alternative.
[[Why post this?]]
why not? You allergic to the gospel or something? lol- The point was to expose the writer as a TDS victim, who’s spirit is one of attacking, not loving kindness- He is trying to foment discord among those that support Donald Trump- instead of realizing that presidents are NOT preachers, and that Pres Trump is worlds better than any democrat would have been- The author is writing like a hateful liberal- not someone who realizes that it is God who appoints leaders to office, and who supports those whom He appoints- knowing that everything works out to His plan-
That’s all
So people will know who the enemy is. This guy claims he is a Christian - and forgets that Paul and Peter give very SPECIFIC commands regarding how Christians are to deal with leaders in Titus 3:1, 2; 1 Timothy 2:1, 2 and 1 Peter 2:13-17 - and in THEIR context - that leader was NERO. Now - regardless of what ANYONE thinks of Trump - I believe EVERYONE can agree he is NO Nero.
Yet this man somehow, in his Christian faith, manages to violate the scripture and badmouth a leader, appointed by God (as ALL leaders are - good AND bad - Daniel 4:25; Romans 13:1-4; John 19:11) - even though that leader falls well below the evil of a Nebuchadnezzar or a Nero - or even a Pilate.
And people need to know such things.
The Bible is truth that is written & inspired by the Creator of Truth.
Why would any person who wishes to be informed not want truth?
Unless, of course, you hate the truth. In which case, your post makes sense and you’ve shown your cards.