1 posted on
02/03/2020 9:22:37 AM PST by
ebb tide
To: Al Hitan; Coleus; DuncanWaring; Fedora; irishjuggler; Jaded; JoeFromSidney; kalee; markomalley; ...
2 posted on
02/03/2020 9:24:52 AM PST by
ebb tide
(We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
To: ebb tide
Article is disappointing.
I went in expecting him to really nail them for embracing falsehoods, untruths and blasphemies.
Instead he appears to have his knickers in a twist over the fact that he did not get preferred seating and a Grand Procession entrance. That’s the sort of arrogance that brought us to this point in the first place.
3 posted on
02/03/2020 9:44:40 AM PST by
Buckeye McFrog
(Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer)
To: ebb tide
Many small signs – for instance the seating arrangement, which was alphabetical and not hierarchical – had questioned the “organic togetherness of consecrated and non-consecrated persons and the diversity of tasks expressed therein.” The archbishop considered this “to be extremely worrying.”
***+++
Seriously? He’s upset about this?
5 posted on
02/03/2020 11:52:04 AM PST by
ealgeone
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson