Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: BigEdLB

Agreed. I highly doubt the Shroud is authentic. But a certain denomination has a penchant for relics.


16 posted on 07/08/2021 5:56:34 PM PDT by BipolarBob (I'm drinking tonight until I'm someone elses problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: BipolarBob; BigEdLB; WildHighlander57

Huh? I took Ed’s point to be the opposite. That the susceptibility of carbon 14 processes to contamination renders the medieval dating unreliable. Two samples were supposed to be extracted but they only took one. Bob it’s not that it was taken from a repaired area per se, it’s that the sample contained interwoven threads from a repair. Where the burns took place there are big patches; minor damage was repaired by interweaving threads to build up and fill in the damage. By definition, the presence of Middle Ages repair threads makes the dating useless. This thing has been handled, subject to large amounts of candle and incense smoke, fire,
Smoke and water damage, and stored, until relatively recently, under very adverse conditions for… yes… 2000 years. The testing didn’t follow its own protocol and is essentially not reliable


19 posted on 07/08/2021 6:06:38 PM PDT by j.havenfarm (20 years on Free Republic, 12/10/20! More than 3700 replies and still not shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson